| ||||||||||||||
A LAWYER'S OPINION:Bush's Shoot First Doctrine Comes Home to Roost
The "Beltway Sniper" appears demented. His (or her) bullets, however, are hitting their marks with deadly accuracy. Since October 2, this lunatic has created mayhem in the Washington, D.C. area. A series of sniper attacks have taken six lives as of October 7, and wounded two others. This is what random violence looks like in all of its raw cruelty. A serial killer profiler has theorized that the sniper is doing the slaughtering because he likes "playing God." Whatever the reasons, this wacky individual is applying his own illegal and immoral "Shoot First Doctrine." It is an axiomatic principle of the law, repeated in the notorious 1984 Bernie Goetz subway shooting case, that it is wrong for any individual to use lethal force against another person, unless "he reasonably believes it is necessary to defend himself or a third person from the imminent use of unlawful physical force by such a person." For the use of deadly force to be used in self defense, objective standards of "reasonableness" must be applied. In other words, it is not what the shooter "perceives" as a threat, since this would allow someone suffering from delusions to "kill or perform acts of violence with impunity, contrary to fundamental principles of justice and criminal law." These principles of self defense generally apply as well to the laws between nations. "A nation is justified in using force only when it has been attacked or is about to be attacked. The acquisition of weapons of mass destruction, or the attempt to acquire them, does not come close to imminent attack." (The Progressive, August, 2002 issue).
Bush intends to destroy any country that possesses weapons of mass destruction or tries to acquire them, if he believes (or his aides, such as the Dr. Strangelove-like Paul Wolfowitz, believe), that they are engaging in or aiding terrorism. This means that nuclear powers, like Russia and China, are potentially on a U.S. nuclear hit list; and Arab regimes, such as Iran, Libya and Syria, that may have chemical or biological weapons, are also fair game to be pulverized by the Bushies. Of course, the White House will insist on vaporizing Iraq before taking on the bigger game. Naturally, any country that feels threatened by Bush's bellicosity might consider striking the U.S. first out of a sense of self preservation. Who could blame them?
Keep in mind, too, that cowboy Bush has called the seriously deranged Sharon "A Man of Peace." Well, what do you expect from a White House whose mouthy press secretary, Ari Fleischer, on Oct. 1, suggested that someone in Iraq assassinate Saddam Hussein? When discussing the potential cost of a U.S. invasion of Iraq, the vulgarian said, "The cost of one bullet, if the Iraq people take it on themselves is substantially less than that." This is the kind of crass dialogue you expect to hear on HBO's "Sopranos" and not from a federal official. After Bush's ill-conceived June 1 "Shoot First" policy announcement, I think it is fair to say that the world is a much more dangerous place. This is especially so with egregious loose cannons, like Wolfowitz, Sharon and Fleischer, also running amok on the world's stage. © William Hughes 2002 William Hughes is the author of "Andrew Jackson vs. New World Order" (Authors Choice Press) and "Baltimore Iconoclast" (Writer's Showcase), which are available online. He can be reached at liamhughes@mindspring.com.
Copyright © 2003 The Baltimore Chronicle and The Sentinel. All rights reserved. We invite your comments, criticisms and suggestions. Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent. This story was published on October 10, 2002. |
| |||||||||||||