Newspaper logo  
 
 
Print view: Roth IRAs Painting the Treasury Red
TAXING MATTERS:

Roth IRAs Painting the Treasury Red

by Gerald E. Scorse
Why should Roths pay taxes only on contributions, while all the other retirement accounts pay on capital gains as well? Why should the others require distributions, but not Roths?

Imagine the government pushing a retirement plan that’s guaranteed to raise the federal deficit. Imagine that the same plan inherently favors the already-favored. Far from imagining, you’re describing Congress’s growing embrace of Roth individual retirement accounts (IRAs).

The lure of Roths is the upfront revenue they bring in. Contributions to Roths are after-tax, unlike the pre-tax contributions to regular IRAs, 401(k)s, and other traditional plans. In fact, Roth accounts are costing the Treasury billions upon billions. Let’s see what drives the losses, and why they’ll be climbing far into the future.

All the money in retirement accounts gets preferential tax treatment going forward. Capital gains grow untaxed, lifting balances year after year. Traditional accounts pay the country back through taxable withdrawals—voluntary starting at age 59 1/2, mandatory at age 70 1/2. The inflows to the Treasury square the books on a win-win bargain: decades of tax-free growth for retirement savings, coupled with decades of growth in downstream tax revenues.

There are no such downstream revenues from Roths. Capital gains are permanently tax-free, creating Treasury shortfalls that erase and ultimately far outstrip the initial boost. There are no required distributions (which might at least spin off some revenue). Losses from Roths grow endlessly; the only question is how large the final numbers will be. Such are the accounts that Congress has chosen to promote—most directly to the affluent, whose incomes once barred them from owning Roths.

The red ink has effectively been flowing ever since the accounts were created in 1997. It turned a deeper red when Congress did away with the $100,000 adjusted gross income limit for Roth conversions. These are paperwork transactions that turn regular IRAs into Roth IRAs. To do this, account holders first have to pay the taxes on the converted amount. The tax bill discourages conversions—but for the well-off, not so much. Investment giants Fidelity and Vanguard reported conversion bonanzas when the income limit came off in 2010.

Roth conversions were back again as part of the 2012 “fiscal cliff” budget deal. The agreement opened the door to immediate conversions by 401(k)s and the like; until then, holders couldn’t convert to Roths before age 59 1/2.

Earlier this year, the Republican majority on the House Ways and Means Committee unveiled the most sweeping tax reform plan in a generation. It makes the first direct attack on traditional accounts, and would sharply increase Roth ownership. It would prohibit any further contributions to regular IRAs. It would limit annual contributions to other traditional accounts to $8,750, half the current maximum; contributions over $8,750 would be channeled into Roth accounts. The income limit for start-up Roths would disappear, just as it has for conversions. According to the GOP plan, these changes would raise about $160 billion over the period 2014-2023. The number is just the latest Roth hocus-pocus: the losses would eventually swamp the apparent gain.

It’s good to help workers save for retirement, as traditional accounts have been doing since the mid-1970s. In contrast, Roths are no help for those who need them, but are a windfall for those who don’t. They cost the Treasury untold billions. They’re also plainly unfair: why should Roths pay taxes only on contributions, while all the other accounts pay on gains as well? Why should the others require distributions, but not Roths?

Howard Gleckman edits TaxVox, the blog of the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. In 2010, with Roth conversions booming and talk of more Roths already in the Capitol air, he flashed a warning signal: “This infatuation with all things Roth bears close watching.”

The infatuation keeps growing, and the red ink just keeps rising.


© 2014 Gerald E. Scorse. Gerald E. Scorse helped pass the bill requiring basis reporting for capital gains. He writes articles on tax policy.



Copyright © 2014 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on May 14, 2014.

 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

03.05 Why I’m a Public-School Teacher but a Private-School Parent

02.27 How to Make College Cheaper

Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

03.05 McDonald’s Moving to Limit Antibiotic Use in Chickens

03.04 Gulf of Mexico Turns Deadly for Dolphins

03.04 Canadian government pushing First Nations to give up land rights for oil and gas profits

03.04 Mapping the global battle to protect our planet

03.04 Air pollution will kill thousands in Europe, EEA warns

03.03 Scientists announce anti-HIV agent so powerful it can work in a vaccine

03.03 Ebola epidemic is 'wake-up call' for investment in universal healthcare

03.03 Water loss: seven things you need to know about an invisible global problem

03.03 Three to five cups of coffee a day may prevent heart attacks, says study

News Media

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & Culture

03.05 Benghazi committee subpoenas Clinton private email account

03.05 Paul Grignon responds to John Oliver on infrastructure [21:13 video]

03.04 Robert Reich: America’s entire political system is rigged

03.04 Why the Hillary Clinton email revelations are a significant problem

03.03 Hillary Clinton's Contempt for Transparency

03.03 Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

03.02 Scott Walker Loses His Mind: What’s Behind His Delusional ISIS-Unions Comparison

03.02 Americans Turning Away From Organized Religion in Record Numbers

03.02 Fear Dominates Politics, Media and Human Existence in America—And It’s Getting Worse

Justice Matters

03.05 Ferguson's Conspiracy Against Black Citizens

03.05 Ferguson mayor: one police officer fired in wake of Justice Department report

03.04 UK should begin decriminalising drugs, say Richard Branson and Nick Clegg

03.04 Ferguson mired in sweeping racial discrimination, federal report finds

03.03 Reporting Sexual Abuse in the Military Is "Inherently Unfair." Here's Why.

High Crimes?

03.05 Prince William in China: illegal wildlife trade a 'vicious form of criminality'

02.27 Aid agencies sound alarm on Gaza amid fears rebuilding could take a century

Economics, Crony Capitalism

03.02 Christie Settles $9 Billion NJ Pollution Case Against Exxon for $250 Million

02.28 Giving Obama fits: The Elizabeth Warren way

International

03.05 White House Official: Nuclear Deal Is Best Way to Avoid War With Iran

03.05 Tomorrowland: How Silicon Valley Shapes Our Future

03.05 Support for using ground troops against the Islamic State is increasing

03.05 North Korea's creeping economic reforms show signs of paying off

03.05 North Korea: US ambassador knife attack was 'expression of resistance'

03.05 Why People "Fly from Facts"

03.04 The Central Question: Is It 1938?

03.04 Between the lines of Binyamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress

03.03 The Science of Why Republicans Are Dead Wrong About Climate Change and National Security

03.03 Postwar Rape: Were Americans As Bad as the Soviets?

03.03 The Mystery of the Netanyahu Disaster, and a Possible Explanation

03.03 Noam Chomsky: Why Israel's Netanyahu Is So Desperate to Prevent Peace with Iran

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
 


Public Service Ads: