Newspaper logo  
 
 
Print view: Gold for Executives, Contempt for Taxpayers
FISCAL MATTERS:

Gold for Executives, Contempt for Taxpayers

by Gerald E. Scorse
Twenty years on, after three presidencies and six Administrations, Section 162(m) stands as a classic example of good intentions leading to bad endings.

Jamie Dimon, the current chairman, president and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase, took high heat over his 74% mega-raise, but he’s not at fault. The blame goes to a 1993 boondoggle for bigwigs—a boondoggle that’s cost taxpayers by the billions ever since. Congress should call a halt, and the country’s mood could push it to do just that.

Ironically, the law that launched the boondoggle started out aiming to do the opposite. Lavish corporate pay packages had turned off many Americans as the 1990s began. To fight the trend, the ’92 Clinton-Gore campaign proposed a $1 million cap on the tax deductibility of salaries paid to a firm’s top echelon. Companies have an absolute right to set executive pay. Congress likewise has the right to limit the amount that qualifies as a corporate tax write-off. Once elected, Clinton moved to enact the reform.

The final result—Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code—ended up delivering gold to the corporate elite and a slap in the face to America’s taxpayers. The statute did impose a $1 million deductibility cap on publicly-held corporations, but it also created a huge loophole. It wrote into law what quickly became the most gilded words in the gilded world of executive compensation: "performance-based pay."

As long as the pay meets IRS benchmarks for “performance-based,” its deductibility is unlimited. Boards of directors routinely find ways to hand out mega-million packages of stock grants, stock options, profit-sharing, stock appreciation rights, every imaginable kind of executive sweetener. Twenty years on, after three presidencies and six Administrations, Section 162(m) stands as a classic example of good intentions leading to bad endings.

A 2012 study by the Economic Policy Institute estimates that Section 162(m) is costing the Treasury about $5 billion a year. A fair number of companies ignore the salary cap and pay more in taxes, but that revenue gets swamped by the shortfall from deductible corporate pay. The Treasury’s wounds from 162(m) have festered forever. With inequality soaring, a few in Congress are finally going after a law that works overtime to drive it higher.

In August 2013, Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) introduced the Stop Subsidizing Multimillion Dollar Corporate Bonuses Act. Blunt title, blunt purpose: “This legislation would close a major loophole in current corporate tax law by putting an end to unlimited tax write-offs on performance-based executive pay.” The bill calls for a blanket $1 million deductibility cap. As Senator Blumenthal noted, corporations are free to “pay their executives whatever they wish, just not at the expense of American taxpayers...” (The same thinking, under the heading “Stop Subsidies for Excessive Compensation,” appears in the tax reform plan unveiled late last month by the GOP members of the House Ways and Means Committee. That plan takes aim as well at the huge salaries paid out by non-profits.)

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) introduced a House version of the Reed-Blumenthal bill earlier this year. “Most Americans,” the Congressman said, “would probably be surprised to learn that multimillion dollar executive bonuses are currently tax write-offs.”

Most Americans might be surprised, but legislators in both parties know only too well. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) formerly chaired the Senate Finance Committee. As the 2006 chair, he admitted that Section 162(m) “really hasn’t worked at all. Companies have found it easy to get around...It has more holes than Swiss cheese. And it seems to have encouraged the options industry.” Options play a big part in performance pay; in 2009, Senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and John McCain (R-AZ) co-sponsored a bill which would have extended the current $1 million cap to options awards.

Section 162(m) has failed as tax policy, but it does two things to perfection: it runs up federal red ink, and it shows contempt for taxpayers. Better late than never, Congress should act to stop the bleeding and end the long, long insult.


© 2014 Gerald E. Scorse. Scorse's articles on taxes have appeared in publications across the country.



Copyright © 2014 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on March 22, 2014.

 
Local Gov’t Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

01.17 Trump’s nominee to head EPA has opposed the Chesapeake Bay cleanup

01.15 Stoop stories

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

01.23 President Trump Takes Immediate Aim at Obama’s Climate Action Plan [immoral actions that will directly shorten or end life for greater fossil fuel profit]

01.23 Trump’s Health Plan Would Convert Medicaid to Block Grants, Aide Says

01.23 Rise in Early Cervical Cancer Detection Is Linked to Affordable Care Act

01.23 The Republican Health Care Con

01.23 97% of Endangered Species Threatened by Two Common Pesticides

01.23 We are destroying rainforests so quickly they may be gone in 100 years

01.20 Scottish government targets 66% emissions cut by 2032

01.20 This is how American health care kills people

01.20 After 1,000 days, Flint is still without clean drinking water

01.20 Top climate experts give their advice to Donald Trump

01.20 China eyes an opportunity to take ownership of climate change fight

01.19 Tom Price’s Obamacare obfuscation: Trump’s health secretary nominee previews how GOP plans to sell an ACA “replacement” [if you're poor, screw you!]

01.19 Outgoing EPA chief reveals fears Trump administration will halt climate action

01.19 Reasons to be cheerful: a full switch to low-carbon energy is in sight

01.19 Donald Trump’s mission? To keep the US in the fossil age [videos]

01.18 Exxon doubling Permian Basin holdings in U.S. for up to $6.6 billion [preparations are in place to quickly maximize fossil fuel extraction, pollution and life-threatening greed]

News Media Matters

01.23

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

01.23 A Bold Plan to Prevent Homelessness

01.22 Reich: 7 Hard Truths for Democrats—The Future Is Bleak Without Radical Reforms

01.22 Yes, America, you can resist the brutishness of the reign of Trump — when progressives truly unite

01.22 TODAY, WE MARCH

01.22 Attend Trump’s Inauguration? This Democratic Congressman Literally Took a Hike.

01.22 10 cities, 10 marches: how US women marked their opposition to Trump

01.22 Trump's inauguration crowd: Sean Spicer's claims versus the evidence

01.21 Lest We Forget [23:31 video & transcript]

01.21 Donald Trump Preaches Angry Nationalism, While Practicing Goldman Sachs Capitalism

01.21 Trump era begins with Obamacare rollback and missile defence orders

Justice Matters

01.19 FBI joins 5 other intelligence agencies in investigating secret Russian aid to Donald Trump

01.18 Obama commutes sentence for political prisoner Oscar López Rivera

01.18 Chelsea Manning's prison sentence commuted by Barack Obama

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

01.19 Déjà vu All Over Again: The GOP Prepares to Make the Rich Even Richer

01.18 Middle classes in crisis, IMF's Christine Lagarde tells Davos 2017

International

01.23 Benoît Hamon tops poll in first round of French Socialist primary race

01.22 Artificial intelligence is growing so fast, even Google's co-founder is surprised

01.22 Globalisation once made the world go around. Is it about to grind to a halt?

01.21 German dismay at Trump inauguration

01.21 Canadians traveling to Women's March denied US entry after sharing their plans

01.21 Under President Trump, we’ll enter an age of global confrontation

01.21 Marine Le Pen leads gathering of EU far-right leaders in Koblenz

01.21 Women's March on Washington, London and global anti-Trump protests - live coverage

01.20 Commentary: What the Davos crowd needs to understand

01.20 China urges Trump: be our friend, not our enemy

01.20 George Soros: Theresa May won't last and Donald Trump is 'would-be dictator'

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
 

Public Service Ads: