Newspaper logo  
 
 
Print view: Gold for Executives, Contempt for Taxpayers
FISCAL MATTERS:

Gold for Executives, Contempt for Taxpayers

by Gerald E. Scorse
Twenty years on, after three presidencies and six Administrations, Section 162(m) stands as a classic example of good intentions leading to bad endings.

Jamie Dimon, the current chairman, president and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase, took high heat over his 74% mega-raise, but he’s not at fault. The blame goes to a 1993 boondoggle for bigwigs—a boondoggle that’s cost taxpayers by the billions ever since. Congress should call a halt, and the country’s mood could push it to do just that.

Ironically, the law that launched the boondoggle started out aiming to do the opposite. Lavish corporate pay packages had turned off many Americans as the 1990s began. To fight the trend, the ’92 Clinton-Gore campaign proposed a $1 million cap on the tax deductibility of salaries paid to a firm’s top echelon. Companies have an absolute right to set executive pay. Congress likewise has the right to limit the amount that qualifies as a corporate tax write-off. Once elected, Clinton moved to enact the reform.

The final result—Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code—ended up delivering gold to the corporate elite and a slap in the face to America’s taxpayers. The statute did impose a $1 million deductibility cap on publicly-held corporations, but it also created a huge loophole. It wrote into law what quickly became the most gilded words in the gilded world of executive compensation: "performance-based pay."

As long as the pay meets IRS benchmarks for “performance-based,” its deductibility is unlimited. Boards of directors routinely find ways to hand out mega-million packages of stock grants, stock options, profit-sharing, stock appreciation rights, every imaginable kind of executive sweetener. Twenty years on, after three presidencies and six Administrations, Section 162(m) stands as a classic example of good intentions leading to bad endings.

A 2012 study by the Economic Policy Institute estimates that Section 162(m) is costing the Treasury about $5 billion a year. A fair number of companies ignore the salary cap and pay more in taxes, but that revenue gets swamped by the shortfall from deductible corporate pay. The Treasury’s wounds from 162(m) have festered forever. With inequality soaring, a few in Congress are finally going after a law that works overtime to drive it higher.

In August 2013, Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) introduced the Stop Subsidizing Multimillion Dollar Corporate Bonuses Act. Blunt title, blunt purpose: “This legislation would close a major loophole in current corporate tax law by putting an end to unlimited tax write-offs on performance-based executive pay.” The bill calls for a blanket $1 million deductibility cap. As Senator Blumenthal noted, corporations are free to “pay their executives whatever they wish, just not at the expense of American taxpayers...” (The same thinking, under the heading “Stop Subsidies for Excessive Compensation,” appears in the tax reform plan unveiled late last month by the GOP members of the House Ways and Means Committee. That plan takes aim as well at the huge salaries paid out by non-profits.)

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) introduced a House version of the Reed-Blumenthal bill earlier this year. “Most Americans,” the Congressman said, “would probably be surprised to learn that multimillion dollar executive bonuses are currently tax write-offs.”

Most Americans might be surprised, but legislators in both parties know only too well. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) formerly chaired the Senate Finance Committee. As the 2006 chair, he admitted that Section 162(m) “really hasn’t worked at all. Companies have found it easy to get around...It has more holes than Swiss cheese. And it seems to have encouraged the options industry.” Options play a big part in performance pay; in 2009, Senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and John McCain (R-AZ) co-sponsored a bill which would have extended the current $1 million cap to options awards.

Section 162(m) has failed as tax policy, but it does two things to perfection: it runs up federal red ink, and it shows contempt for taxpayers. Better late than never, Congress should act to stop the bleeding and end the long, long insult.


© 2014 Gerald E. Scorse. Scorse's articles on taxes have appeared in publications across the country.



Copyright © 2014 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on March 22, 2014.

 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

09.15 James Heckman: Early Interventions Lead To Higher IQs [20:30 video]

09.12 Millennials Are Out-Reading Older Generations

Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

09.16 Fixing Climate Change May Add No Costs, Report Says

09.16 Beating Back the Risk of Diabetes

09.16 There's a Place in the World That Is Fighting Poverty with Solar Power

09.16 Obama to announce Ebola force of 3,000 US military personnel

09.15 Sun and Wind Alter Global Landscape, Leaving Utilities Behind

09.15 Emma Thompson: 'It's a different patch of life, your 50s'

09.14 Full Show: Climate Change — Faith and Fact [25:15 video]

09.14 Naomi Klein: the hypocrisy behind the big business climate change battle

09.13 The Way to Beat Poverty

09.13 Brain Trauma to Affect One in Three Players, N.F.L. Agrees

News Media

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

Justice Matters

09.12 Sixteen Female Senators Pressure NFL to Adopt Zero-Tolerance Domestic Violence Policy

09.12 Rape Culture in the Alaskan Wilderness

09.12 Men involved in Malala Yousafzai shooting arrested in Pakistan

US Politics, Policy & Culture

09.16 Elections 2014: Make Your Own Senate Forecast [interactive map]

09.16 Greening Up in Burlington, Rocking Out in Allentown

09.15 Home Free?

09.15 A Bigger Midterm Election Turnout

09.14 More Americans Speak in Tongues

High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism

09.15 Letting the Rich Take All The Money

09.15 The TTIP deal hands British sovereignty to multinationals

09.10 However Useless, Economic Development Incentives Are on the Rise

09.10 Low Wage Growth, High Long-Term Unemployment Recognized as International Problem [charts]

09.09 If Your Kids Get Free Health Care, You’re More Likely to Start a Company

09.09 Harvard survey: US wealth gap is "unsustainable"

International

09.16 Europe's Deadly Borders: An Inside Look at EU's Shameful Immigration Policy

09.16 Migrant boat was 'deliberately sunk' in Mediterranean sea, killing 500

09.16 US steps up Isis fight with air strike near Baghdad

09.16 Religion and the American armed forces: One army under God?

09.15 Earth: 248 armed conflicts after WW2; US started 201 (81%), killing 30 million so far. Arrests are when now?

09.15 The Traffic Lights of Tomorrow Will Actively Manage Congestion

09.15 Bombs won’t solve the Isis problem

09.15 Israeli refuseniks will be treated as criminals, says defence minister

09.14 The Pornography of Jihadism

09.14 What’s Their Plan?

09.14 Kerry Scours Mideast for Aid in ISIS Fight

09.13 Scotland's Democratic Revolution

09.13 Veterans of Elite Israeli Unit Refuse Reserve Duty, Citing Treatment of Palestinians

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
 


Public Service Ads: