Newspaper logo  
 
 

01.30 Scientists Call on Obama Administration to Use Science as Guide for Arctic

01.28 Universal health care proposal stalls in California Senate

01.27 Apple, Electronics and Environmental Ills

01.25 Solar Cheaper Than Diesel Making India’s Mittal Believer: Energy

01.24 Sounding an Alarm on Birds and Mercury

01.24 Why Don’t We Have Abundant Solar Power? Blame Financing, and Industry, not Science

01.22 The Money Traps in U.S. Health Care

01.22 Looking Inside the Twinkie

Ref. Dollars for Doctors - How Industry Money Reaches Physicians

Ref. 2010 Comparative Price Report Medical and Hospital Fees by Country - Graphics

Ref. Health at a Glance 2011 - OECD Indicators

Ref. : Why is Healthcare Absurdly Expensive in USA (Part 2) [Graphics] (Part 1 is here)

Video Health Care Systems in Less Corrupt Countries

“News” Media

02.03 Media Watch: CNN's Erin Burnett regurgitates right-wing talking points to scare retired people - video

02.02 ABC's Iran Propaganda

02.02 The Ongoing “Foxification” of the Wall Street Journal

01.30 While temperatures rise, denialists reach lower

01.29 Fox News psychiatrist: Newt Gingrich's affairs 'mean he might make a strong president'

01.22 ‘Shocking victory’: With SOPA shelved, Markos Moulitsas on a way forward for Internet policy - video

Daily The Daily Howler

Justice Matters

02.03 Senate Votes To Ban Its Members From Insider Trading... Kind Of

01.31 Senate clears way for vote on insider-trading ban

01.25 Why all the robo-signing? Shedding light on the shadow banking system

01.25 In Iraq, Haditha case is reminder of justice denied

01.22 Still Not Clear on SOPA & PIPA? Infographic w/Simple Explanations

US Politics, Policy & Culture

02.03 SUPERBOWL XLVI: Are You Ready for Some Football???

02.03 Buffett rules: Sheldon Whitehouse introduces the Paying a Fair Share Act - video

02.02 Secrecy Shrouds ‘Super PAC’ Funds in Latest Filings

02.02 Steve Israel condemns GOP Keystone XL ‘stunt,’ cheers Democratic Drive to 25 to reclaim the House - video

02.01 Rich Patrons Are Major Source of Romney’s Cash

01.31 How Newt Gingrich Crippled Congress

01.30 The Truth About the Conservative Mind: Why Reactionaries from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin Have Fought Real Liberty

01.30 Corporate Rule Is Not Inevitable

01.30 Clashes in Oakland: 400 Arrests, Tear Gas, Flash-Bang Grenades

01.30 A European look at the US primaries - video

01.29 Obama’s Faux Populism Sounds Like Bill Clinton

01.25 Inside Romney’s Tax Returns: A Reading Guide

01.24 ILLUSIONS: Being Led Down the Primrose Path...???

01.24 Science Bulletins: Whales Give Dolphins a Lift - video

01.24 Buffett On Why Romney Should Pay Higher Taxes: He’s Just ‘Shoving Around Money,’ Not ‘Straining His Back’

01.24 THE OBAMA MEMOS

01.22 Three Takeaways From South Carolina

01.21 Why Is There So Much God in Our Politics? The Religious Right's Theocratic Plan for the 2012 Election

High Crimes?
Economics, Gov't. & Business

02.03 PRIVATE INEQUITY

02.02 The New American Divide

02.02 American Airlines proposes to end all four pension plans

02.01 Economics 101

01.30 New Strategy, Old Pentagon Budget

01.30 Where Did All the Workers Go? 60 Years of Economic Change in 1 Graph

01.29 The Apple Boycott: People Are Spouting Nonsense about Chinese Manufacturing

01.29 Made in the World

01.28 Matt Taibbi ponders whether Obama’s embrace of populist rhetoric is already impacting Wall Street - video

01.28 Sugar daddy Adelson could save $500 million in taxes if his boy Gingrich wins - video

01.28 How Swedes and Norwegians broke the power of the ‘1 percent’

01.27 Unemployment in Spain Rises to 22.9%

01.27 Chinese Company Continues Plan To Replace Workforce With 500,000 Robots

01.27 Details Emerge of New Financial Fraud Unit

01.27 Not all jobs are equal

01.27 The Shift from Manufacturing to Service Economy - Graphic

01.25 Billionaires Occupy Davos as 0.01% Bemoan Inequality

01.24 Germany has the economic strengths America once boasted

01.23 State Capitalism: The visible hand

01.22 How Big Money Bought Our Democracy, Corrupted Both Parties, and Set Us Up for Another Financial Crisis - video

01.22 How U.S. lost out on Apple's iPhone work

International

02.03 What the Occupy movement must learn from Sundance

02.02 US plans to halt Afghan combat role early surprise Kabul

01.31 TABLE TALK

01.30 With its deadly drones, the US is fighting a coward's war

01.30 UN panel aims for 'a future worth choosing'

01.26 Iran is ready to return to nuclear talks

01.24 Reagan’s Hand in Guatemala’s Genocide

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Obama, They Want You to Fail
Newspaper logo

INFANTILE REPUBLICAN BEHAVIOR:

Obama, They Want You to Fail

by Robert Parry
Originally published 29 June 2009

After last year’s elections, a Democratic operative told me that if the Democrats got to 59 seats in the Senate, it would be easy to peel off one or two Republicans to pass key legislation like serious health care reform. I was left wondering what political planet he'd been living on for the past three decades.

For almost as long as I’ve been in Washington (I arrived for the Associated Press in 1977) it has worked the other way. Even when the Republicans appear to be on the defensive and outnumbered, they band together and vote as a bloc, while Democrats bend over backwards to be “bipartisan.”

This dynamic has continued into Barack Obama’s presidency as he and the Democrats have watered down their proposals with the hope of winning over a few Republican votes so they can claim they achieved some bipartisanship, even if it means passing bills that are half-hearted half-measures.

That process dominated the debate over the $787 billion stimulus bill that the Democrats diluted with Republican tax cuts and shrank in size despite warnings from top economists that the package would fall far short of the needed boost in jobs, a bleak prediction that now appears to be coming true as unemployment climbs toward 10 percent.

In exchange for the weaker stimulus bill, the Democrats got three Republican votes in the Senate and none in the House. (The Republicans then drove one of those GOP senators, Arlen Specter, out of the party, though Specter still won’t count himself as a reliable Democratic vote.)

The pattern of belligerent Republicans and timid Democrats is now repeating itself on health-care reform. Democrats first excluded from the debate the one measure that probably could save significant money – a single-payer system – and they now appear poised to trade away Obama’s proposal for a “public option” to possibly garner a couple of Republican votes.

Though enacting a public option is favored by nearly three-quarters of the American people – and has the potential of at least saving some money by pressuring private insurers to rein in costs – Democrats are so entranced by the siren song of bipartisanship that they appear on the verge of scuttling it.

The fundamental flaw in Hillary Clinton's complex scheme was that it tried too hard not to harm the insurance industry.

In doing so, the Democrats could well recreate the worst mistake of Hillary Clinton’s failed health insurance plan of 1994. The fundamental flaw in her complex scheme was that it tried so hard not to harm the insurance industry that it wasn’t clear how it would make matters any better – and the industry still torpedoed it with a misleading public relations campaign.

if the nation is really going to address its health care crisis, there will have to be some financial losers.

Today, the Obama administration and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus have been so proud of getting all the players to sit down at the table (with the exception of single-payer advocates who were excluded) that they have lost track of the hard reality that if the nation is really going to address its health care crisis, there will have to be some financial losers.

Right now, the losers are the tens of millions of uninsured and under-insured Americans, the doctors and nurses who are appalled at the cruelty of the U.S. medical system, and the U.S. businesses that pay for their employees’ health insurance and thus are put at an economic disadvantage to their foreign competitors operating in countries that have single-payer systems.

Helping the Industry

For the status quo to change significantly, the private health insurance companies and other parts of the medical industrial complex must be compelled to extract savings from their bureaucratic waste and excess profits. To do that would require, at minimum, a robust “public option” that forces a revamping of the private health insurance business model.

Not surprisingly, the health insurance industry doesn’t want to undergo such a transformation, so its lobbyists have leaned on the Republicans and a handful of “centrist” Democrats to either kill the “public option” or in Baucus’s phrase “sculpt” it into something that doesn’t threaten the industry.

That’s where Sen. Kent Conrad’s scheme of setting up “cooperatives” comes in. The North Dakota Democrat has proposed building from scratch a network of non-profit “cooperatives” that would lack both the size for administrative savings and the bargaining power to negotiate lower prices.

While a public option could piggyback on the Medicare bureaucracy to maximize savings and have the advantage of simplicity, the emerging Baucus-Conrad scheme would add an array of cooperatives to the already confusing mix of insurance plans. For many Americans, these new entities won’t present an appealing alternative to private insurance.

If such a “compromise” emerges, a few Republicans might vote yes; the industry would be happy; and the Obama administration could have a “bipartisan” signing ceremony.

But the American people might find themselves left out of the celebration. The federal government might even compel the uninsured – under penalty of fines – to sign up with an existing insurance company whether they feel they can afford it or not. Mandated coverage could mean a big windfall for the insurance industry, pushing nearly 50 million new customers into its arms.

Eventually, however, the reality would sink in that very little had improved. Millions of Americans would understand that Washington protected the interests of a cold-hearted industry rather than fashion a health-insurance plan that would do the people much good.  With that realization, many Americans would blame Obama and the Democrats.

On the other hand, if Obama demanded a public option and insisted on the support of his party, the dynamic might go very differently. If the Democrats assembled 59 votes for a strong plan – even if Republicans continue their obstruction of Al Franken’s Senate election in Minnesota – that could turn the tables on “centrist” Republicans who would have to decide which side to take.

To get the Democrats to behave in such a disciplined and serious fashion, however, might require a backbone or brain transplant for many of them. But it’s way past time for the Democrats to recognize that their obsession with bipartisanship is unrequited.

The Republicans have a very different agenda. Indeed, with the continuing pratfalls of their supposedly top-tier candidates – like South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford’s Argentine holiday with his mistress – they have only one genuine hope for the future of their party: President Obama must fail and the Democrats must take the blame.


Robert ParryRobert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat, and can be ordered at neckdeepbook.com. His two previous books, Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth' are also available there. Or go to Amazon.com.

This article is republished in the Baltimore Chronicle with permission of the author.



Copyright © 2009 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own.

This story was published on June 29, 2009.

 


Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland