| ||||||||||||||
|
Local News & Opinion
Ref.: Civic Events Ref.: Arts & Education Events Ref.: Public Service Notices Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
02.12 FiveBooks Interviews > Lorraine Adams on The Truth Behind the Headlines Letters
Ref. : Letters to the editor Health Care & Environment
02.13 Congress nearly eliminates funds for lead poisoning 02.10 LET’S REMAKE THE WAY WE MAKE THINGS 02.09 Cancer rates triple among New York police officers who responded to 9/11 02.08 The seed emergency: The threat to food and democracy 02.07 Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering 02.04 Your Day at the Beach Could Soon Lead to a Night at the Hospital 02.03 Obama Won't Touch Climate With a 10-Foot Pole 02.03 Komen reverses decision to cut Planned Parenthood funding 02.03 Reforming EU Deep-Sea Fisheries Management 02.02 By defunding Planned Parenthood, the Susan G Komen Foundation betrays women 02.02 Ohio Tries to Escape Fate as a Dumping Ground for Fracking Fluid Ref. Dollars for Doctors - How Industry Money Reaches Physicians Ref. 2010 Comparative Price Report Medical and Hospital Fees by Country - Graphics Ref. Health at a Glance 2011 - OECD Indicators Ref. : Why is Healthcare Absurdly Expensive in USA (Part 2) [Graphics] (Part 1 is here) Video Health Care Systems in Less Corrupt Countries “News” Media
02.07 Did Obama make the economy worse? Not according to most statistics 02.02 ABC's Iran Propaganda 02.02 The Ongoing “Foxification” of the Wall Street Journal Daily The Daily Howler Justice Matters
02.13 News Corp may face US inquiry after Sun arrests at News International 02.13 Why Was No One Punished for America's "My Lai" in Iraq? 02.05 Why the AGs Must Not Settle: Robo-signing Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg 02.04 THE CAGING OF AMERICA 02.03 Senate Votes To Ban Its Members From Insider Trading... Kind Of US Politics, Policy & Culture
02.13 Bill Maher: Republicans Divide America - video 02.13 The right's stupidity spreads, enabled by a too-polite left 02.12 Even Critics of Safety Net Increasingly Depend on It - Interactive Map: Where Americans Most Depend on Government Benefits 02.12 CPAC attendees more focused on the economy than their right-wing leaders - video 02.10 The Cancer in Occupy 02.10 How Opus Dei Influenced Rick Santorum 02.10 People Are Not Leaving the Labor Force 02.09 Obama, Explained 02.09 OPED: The White Underclass 02.09 EDITORIAL: A Terrible Transportation Bill 02.09 THE OBAMA MEMOS 02.06 Are Conservatives More Fearful Than Liberals? 02.04 Soaking the Poor, State by State 02.04 Reddit Co-Founder Alexis Ohanian's Rosy Outlook On The Future of Politics 02.03 SUPERBOWL XLVI: Are You Ready for Some Football??? 02.03 Buffett rules: Sheldon Whitehouse introduces the Paying a Fair Share Act - video 02.02 Secrecy Shrouds ‘Super PAC’ Funds in Latest Filings 02.01 Rich Patrons Are Major Source of Romney’s Cash High Crimes?
Economics, Crony Capitalism
02.13 EDITORIAL: The Big Money Behind State Laws 02.10 This is no bailout for Main Street America 02.10 Why the Foreclosure Deal May Not Be So Hot After All 02.10 Matt Taibbi assesses the $26 billion settlement designed to aid victims of foreclosure fraud - video 02.10 Foreclosure Deal to Spur U.S. Home Seizures 02.09 S.E.C. Is Avoiding Tough Sanctions for Large Banks 02.08 Banks Paying Homeowners to Avoid Foreclosures 02.07 App Stores Create 500,000 U.S. Jobs 02.07 The Payroll Tax Fight 02.07 Obama super PAC decision: President blesses fundraising for Priorities USA Action 02.06 How Privatizing Government Shovels Cash to Parasitic Corporations and Undermines Democracy 02.05 We’re More Unequal Than You Think – Graphic: Unequal rise in income 02.03 PRIVATE INEQUITY 02.02 The New American Divide 02.02 American Airlines proposes to end all four pension plans 02.01 Economics 101 Ref. We’re More Unequal Than You Think – Graphic: Unequal rise in income International
02.03 What the Occupy movement must learn from Sundance 02.02 US plans to halt Afghan combat role early surprise Kabul We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
You can also mail a check to: Baltimore News Network, Inc. P.O. Box 42581 Baltimore, MD 21284-2581 |
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS:Just Thinking Aloud HereTue, 09/23/2008
I'm thinking about what that same indescribably vast amount of federal money could do if it were applied to more important things than rescuing a bunch of crooked banks.
When the bankers and investment bankers and insurance execs blew it, and were facing the prospect of losing their bonuses and their companies, the Bush administration rushed in as though they were a bunch of victims of a hurricane facing flooding and imminent death (no, wait a minute, Bush and his gang didn't do squat when that situation arose in New Orleans), or rather, as though they were a bevy of oil industry "lobbyists" offering night service.
Bush's Treasury Secretary, former Goldman Sachs investment banker Hank Paulson, and Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, are calling for a no-strings-attached handout to rescue these screw-ups and con men which is in the range of $700 billion to $1 trillion. Now I'm thinking about what that same indescribably vast amount of federal money could do if it were applied to more important things than rescuing a bunch of crooked banks. Let's see... The entire federal budget for America's decrepit, overcrowded and underfunded educational system is $56 billion. That could be doubled for just $56 billion--enough to dramatically reduce class sizes, replace collapsing buildings, and pay teachers a living wage across America. The Department of Justice budget is $20.2 billion, most of which goes for locking up hundreds of thousands of people, to little effect other than destroying families and creating more criminals. Another $20 billion, spent on job training and education for non-violent offenders, young offenders and people whose crimes are less serious than, say, murder, could have a huge impact on getting or keeping people out of jail, on rescuing communities and on reducing the crime rate. The Department of energy spends $24.3 billion, primarily for making and storing nuclear weapons, running nuclear plants and waste sites, and operating the strategic oil reserve. Tripling that budget by adding $50 billion for a crash program to fund massive R&D into non-carbon energy sources like waves, wind, solar, geothermal, etc., and to subsidize home conversions to geothermal heating and other major energy-saving technologies could significantly push back the looming catastrophe of global over-heating. Supposedly there are about 5 million families who are stuck with deceptively marketed so-called sub-prime mortgages that had hidden clauses like balloon payments or interest resets which make it impossible for them to pay and put them at risk of default and eviction. Given that most of the victims are living in low-income neighborhoods, the actual value of their homes is probably well below the average US home price of $200,000. If the government or Congress were to mandate rewriting of their policies to accurately reflect the value of those homes, and then established a fund to back those renegotiated mortgages, it could all probably be done for under $50 billion. The existing public transit system across the US is in desperate shape. Right now, virtually all of the federal transportation budget of $12.1 billion goes towards airports and the highway system. The former is largely a luxury serving the rich, and the latter is contributing to the destruction of the planet by encouraging auto use which nobody can afford any longer anyhow. If the government were to quadruple that budget by adding another $50 billion for building and subsidizing the fares on inter-city and urban mass transit systems, we'd be on the way to solving both our national oil addiction, and global warming. Looking over this list, I see we're still only about a third of the way to $700 million, or a quarter of the way to $1 trillion. I guess if we want to spend the rest of this easy money, maybe we could kick in $200 billion which would be more than enough to provide full health insurance coverage to every family in America. Since it would take a while to get that system up and running, maybe it would be a good idea to set aside the other $3-400 billion in a fund to pay for the next two years of the program until it could start being funded through taxes (which people would be happy to pay since they'd no longer be paying the much higher health insurance premiums and medical bills they currently pay, and because they'd be getting fatter paychecks since their employers would be off the hook for their insurance). Seems to me this would all make a lot more sense than bailing out the bankers. And here's an added benefit. As of today, 26 percent of the national jobs payroll goes to people employed in the bloated financial services sector, to people who for the most part perform no productive activity at all. If the financial services sector is not bailed out, and is instead left to crash and burn, many of those people will be forced to go out and get an honest job. We'll still have banks, of course, and even investment banks, but if they perpetrators of the past two decades of casinomics get seriously burned, it will be a while before they return to such practices. Put a few million bankers and investment bankers on the unemployment line and in the food stamp office, and force them to rely on Medicaid for their health care, and we'll start to see some real pressure for improvements in those perennially underfunded programs! Don't cry for the displaced banker and former "masters of the universe," as they were fond of calling themselves. There will, in this brave new world, be lots of new jobs as streetcar conductors, nurses aides, teachers and geothermal heating system installers, that they can retrain for. About the author: Philadelphia journalist Dave Lindorff is a 34-year veteran, an award-winning journalist, a former New York Times contributor, a graduate of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, a two-time Journalism Fulbright Scholar, and the co-author, with Barbara Olshansky, of a well-regarded book on impeachment, The Case for ImpeachmentCopyright © 2008 The Baltimore News Network. All rights reserved.
Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent. Baltimore News Network, Inc., sponsor of this web site, is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed in stories posted on this web site are the authors' own. This story was published on September 24, 2008. |
| ||||||||||||