Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters
Open Letters:

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

05.27 Memo to Jeb Bush: denying human-caused global warming is ignorant

05.27 Growth at all costs: climate change, fossil fuel subsidies and the Treasury

05.27 Peru planning to dam Amazon’s main source and displace 1000s

05.26 Suicide By Pesticide

05.26 ‘Climate Change Deniers Are Like Alcoholics’ | Ed Begley, Jr. [9:50 video]

05.26 Companies aren't doing enough to prevent catastrophic climate change, new report finds

05.26 Dow Chemical aims to 'redefine the role of business in society'

05.25 Decision Time on the Hudson

05.25 Stronger Regulation of Toxic Chemicals

05.25 The benefits of solar do outweigh its costs. Some have a hard time accepting it

05.24 Welcome to Baoding, China's most polluted city

05.24 Shell boss endorses warnings about fossil fuels and climate change [Related: Protests at Shell's annual meeting]

05.24 Cannes concludes with call-to-arms on climate change: ‘To not tackle the issue through film would be criminal’

05.24 Denton, Texas, banned fracking last year – then the frackers fought back [It's Texas, so...]

05.24 Can high-tech photosynthesis turn CO2 into fuel for your car?

05.24 California oil spill company under local, state and federal investigation [Non-public infrastructure is stupidly neglected, too]

05.24 Drought-stricken California loses 50m gallons of water as vandals target dam

05.24 Where the River Runs Dry

05.23 California accepts historic offer by farmers to cut water usage by 25%

05.23 Altering Course [long book review]

05.23 Organic farming 'benefits biodiversity' [The opposite of GMO focus on yield only]

05.23 Air Pollution Reduces Cognition, & Not Just Via The Lungs

05.23 Study Finds Possible Association Between Autism and Air Pollution

News Media

05.26 Glenn Greenwald, I’m sorry: Why I changed my mind on Edward Snowden

Daily FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

05.27 Ten Outrageous Ideas Rick Santorum Actually Believes [Getting to know guys on the clown bus]

05.27 Supreme Court Agrees to Settle Meaning of ‘One Person One Vote’

05.27 The Troubled Relationship Between Texas and FEMA

05.26 Bobby Jindal reaches peak stupid: One-time GOP savior embraces hate speech to appease bigots, wingnuts

05.25 Bernie Sanders warns Democratic rivals for presidency: don't underestimate me

05.25 Stupid Pentagon Budget Tricks

05.25 Public-Sector Jobs Vanish, Hitting Blacks Hard

05.25 'Fight for $15' will ease economic inequality. But could it end police violence too?

05.24 Multiple arrests in Cleveland after officer in case of 137 police shots is acquitted [Here we go again]

05.24 Elizabeth Warren is winning: How the progressive icon is remaking politics — without running for president

05.24 7 ways Bernie Sanders could transform America

Justice Matters

05.26 The Fraud of War

05.23 Why We Let Prison Rape Go On

High Crimes?

05.23 Attacks on the last elephants and rhinos threaten entire ecosystems

05.22 Matt Taibbi: World’s Largest Banks Admit to Massive Global Financial Crimes, But Escape Jail (Again)

05.22 Gaza economy 'on verge of collapse', with world's highest unemployment

05.21 Elephant Watch

Economics, Crony Capitalism

05.26 Robert Reich: Corporate Collusion Is Rampant and We All Pay the Steep Price

05.25 Senator Warren calls for public hearings on bank waivers: FT

05.25 Did China Just Launch World's Biggest Spending Plan?

05.25 HSBC fears world recession with no lifeboats left

05.23 EU dropped pesticide laws due to US pressure over TTIP, documents reveal

International

05.27 Steve Wozniak: Edward Snowden is 'a hero to me'

05.26 In Paris, Plans for a Seine Reinvention

05.26 Interview with Chinese Artist Ai Weiwei: 'The State Is Scared'

05.26 Refugee Abuse: Torture Scandal Rocks German Police

05.26 Cyber-Attack Warning: Could Hackers Bring Down a Plane?

05.26 They’re all still lying about Iraq: The real story about the biggest blunder in American history — and the right wing’s obsessive need to cover it up

05.25 Daesh/ ISIL blows up Shiite Mosque in Saudi Arabia, seeking Sectarian Civil War

05.25 US Kneejerk support for Israeli Nukes Torpedoes UN Disarmament Talks

05.25 Did the US DIA see ISIL as a strategic Ally against al-Assad in 2012?

05.25 Burma's birth control law exposes Buddhist fear of Muslim minority

05.25 3,000 children enslaved in Britain after being trafficked from Vietnam

05.25 India heatwave kills more than 500 people

05.25 Amid the ruins of Syria, is Bashar al-Assad now finally facing the end?

05.24 Pentagon report predicted West’s support for Islamist rebels would create ISIS

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web
  Bipartisan Paradise: Liberals, Bush Unite in Ethnic Cleansing of Iraq
Newspaper logo

COMMENTARY:

Bipartisan Paradise: Liberals, Bush Unite in Ethnic Cleansing of Iraq

by Chris Floyd
Iraqi refugee hides form fighting
From the New York Times:
The number of Iraqis fleeing their homes has soared since the American troop increase began in February, according to data from two humanitarian groups, accelerating the partition of the country into sectarian enclaves...The effect of this vast migration is to drain religiously mixed areas in the center of Iraq, sending Shiite refugees toward the overwhelmingly Shiite areas to the south and Sunnis toward majority Sunni regions to the west and north.
It is now obvious that one impetus behind the "surge" was to accelerate the "ethnic cleansing" of Iraq. Given the manifest failure to establish a strong central government to serve as a client state, the conquerors now find it easier to deal with separate ethnic enclaves, which can police themselves, shake out their own internal conflicts (however bloodily) and thus establish some kind of solid leadership that can cut deals and guarantee investments. Most of the measures taken during the "surge" seem aimed precisely at ethnic cleansing: the increased support of the Iraqi government security forces -- which are largely Shiite militias -- has been matched with what some see as the lunatic policy of arming Sunni militias.

Most of the measures taken during the "surge" seem aimed precisely at ethnic cleansing: the increased support of the Iraqi government security forces -- which are largely Shiite militias -- has been matched with what some see as the lunatic policy of arming Sunni militias.
The latter is indeed a lunatic policy -- if your aim is to establish security and political rapprochement in Iraq. And although the leaders of the United States are indeed a gang of depraved moral idiots, they are not lunatics. Even they could see the folly of such a course -- again, if the aim was actually security and political cohesion. Thus one can only conclude that this is not their aim, that their aim is indeed to exacerbate ethnic conflict, to foment more violence, in what amounts to a stealth operation of ethnic cleansing.

This serves two main purposes: first, as noted above, it will help shake the country out, eventually, into more manageable enclaves -- each one stronger and more cohesive than the current government (which is largely a fictional notion at this point), yet weaker, and more malleable, than any stable and legitimate central government would be. And since the only kind of central government that could achieve stability and legitimacy in the eyes of all Iraqis would be one which was genuinely sovereign, truly independent from American domination, we will never see such a government in Baghdad as long as U.S. troops are in Iraq.

Which brings us to the second purpose of the "surge's" arming of sectarian gangs: to maintain a level of violence and chaos that would "justify" the continuing presence of American troops in Iraq. A permanent military presence is one of the overriding goals of the invasion, set down long before the war, before 9/11, even before the loser Bush was given the presidency by five Supreme Court justices (two of whom had family members working for the Bush operation). Therefore, to the Bushists, any measure is justified that will keep American troops in Iraq -- including fomenting bloody sectarian conflict and carrying out ethnic cleansing.

This in turn is tied to another of the chief war aims: the "oil law" that will open Iraq's sumptuous resources to predatory Western investors. This can only be can only be guaranteed by the presence of American troops, backing up some compliant puppet state or "semi-autonomous enclave." Again, a genuinely sovereign, truly independent government would never give away the nation's patrimony to Bush and Cheney's oil baron cronies and their European comrades.

And so the strategy behind the "surge" becomes clear: A united, independent Iraq cannot be allowed to exist, because such a state would not permit a permanent American military presence nor sign away the nation's oil wealth. Therefore, Iraq must be torn apart -- by sectarian strife, ethnic cleansing, terrorism and "counterinsurgency" warfare. And violence must continue until this shake-out is completed, in order to justify the continuing American presence.

While Bush pursues ethnic cleansing by stealth in Iraq -- or rather, pursues it quite openly, but just doesn't call it ethnic cleansing -- the Democrats and their outriders, the "liberal hawks" (or "humanitarian interventionists" or "Wilsonian idealists" or whatever tag they're wearing these days) are championing the policy in the public sphere. The idea of a three-way split of Iraq between Sunnis, Shias and Kurds has long been mooted in some quarters -- Joe Biden and "liberal" intellectuals like Leslie Gelb and Peter Galbraith were early enthusiasts -- and it is now gaining force within the foreign policy "clerisy" that Glenn Greenwald and Arthur Silber have been dissecting in recent days. Firedoglake points us to the incisive commentaries of Reidar Visser, "an actual expert on the regional aspects of Iraq and its history," who has lately been debunking the deeply ignorant and murderously arrogant "partition" proposals of Galbraith and others.

Michael O'HanlonVisser takes aim at one of the most hideous of these proposals: "The Case for Soft Partition in Iraq," by respected "scholars" Michael O'Hanlon (see A Tiny Revolution for more on this fine mind of our time) and Edward Joseph. When I first read of these gentlemen's work, I thought it must surely be a parody, a take-off on the deadly serious, genocidal fantasies of Philip Atkinson, who, on a website hardwired to the rightwing power grid of Frank Gaffney, James Woolsey and Dick Cheney, called for Bush to nuke Iraq, repopulate it with Americans and declare himself President-for-Life. The O-Hanlon-Joseph piece for the highly respectable Brookings Institution partakes of that same kind of murderous fantasy. As Visser notes:
...using cool academic language, the authors review the nuts and bolts of relocating somewhere between 2 and 5 million Iraqis in order to create new ethnic federal entities. Snippets from this part of the report probably speak best for themselves: “we advocate where possible dividing major cities along natural boundaries” (p. 16); “on the actual day of the relocation operation, Iraqi and US-led coalition forces would deploy in sufficient numbers to look for snipers, cover the flanks of the civilian convoys, inspect suspicious vehicles for explosives and conduct similar tasks” (p. 17); and finally, on p. 24, “this [internal border] control system would place some burdens on Iraq’s internal trade and other aspects of its economy. It would complicate the efforts of individuals to cross from one region to another to visit family and friends. For the most part these burdens would be bearable. For individuals or businesses that need to make frequent crossings across Iraq’s new internal borders, or those willing to pay for the privilege, an EZ pass system [sic] might be developed to expedite movements for those with important and regular business to conduct.”
"On the actual day of the relocation operation...." Try to imagine such a day, when millions of Iraqis are uprooted and forced to move to other areas, all under guard by "Iraqi and US-led coalition forces." Actually it's not that hard to imagine, for we have seen it before: in faded photographs and newsreel footage and films like "The Sorrow and the Pity," "Shoah," and "Schindler's List." Less familiar in the popular imagination but perhaps even more apposite are the "relocations" of ethnic populations carried out by Josef Stalin, when whole peoples, such as the Chechens, were uprooted and transported by force to other regions. Or we could of course look closer to home, at the "Trail of Tears," the deadly removal of the Cherokee from their homelands to concentration camps in Oklahoma.

These kinds of scenes are precisely what the clean-limbed O'Hanlon and his partner envisage for Iraq, followed by a life ensnared by checkpoints and passes and internal border controls. It may sound harsh, brutal and inhuman, but not to worry: "For the most part these burdens would be bearable."

I have a suggestion for Mr. O'Hanlon. I propose that he subject himself to such a regimen, then come back and tell just us how "bearable" it is. He doesn't even have to move five million Iraqis under armed guard to participate in this experiment: he can go to Palestine right now, where the people already live under his kind of "soft partition." Let him try it on for himself, just for a few months -- not the lifelong sentence he proposes for the Iraqis. We can even give him an "EZ Pass" to expedite any "important business" he needs to do.

This is what we've come to -- or perhaps, harking back to the Trail of Tears, this is where we came in. Ignorant, arrogant, cowardly elites proposing -- and in Bush's case, inflicting -- vast human suffering on innocent people, driving them from their homes, terrorizing them, killing them. And all of this done for no other reason but to enhance the coddled elite's power, privilege and pleasures.
photo of Chris FloydChris Floyd is an American journalist and the Editor and co-founder of the Atlantic Free Press. His work has appeared in print and online in venues all over the world, including the Nation, CounterPunch, Columbia Journalism Review, the Christian Science Monitor, Il Manifesto, the Moscow Times and many others. He is the author of Empire Burlesque: High Crimes and Low Comedy in the Bush Imperium, and is co-founder and editor of the "Empire Burlesque" political blog. He can be reached at cfloyd72@gmail.com.

This column originally appeared on Chris Floyd's site, and is republished here with the permission of the author.


Copyright © 2007 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on August 24, 2007.
 


Public Service Ads: