Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

09.25 State Elections Boards Seeks Volunteers to Help Process Unprecedented Number of Voter Applications

Travel
Books, Arts & Education

09.18 Reviewing Danny Schechter's "Plunder: Investigating Our Economic Calamity and the Subprime Scandal"

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

09.30 To Joe Biden: Time for Confession

09.28 Open Letter to Senator Barack Obama

09.26 Bailout Package Must be Transparent to the American People

09.18 Possible $2 Million Donation to Support Md. Slots Sends Wrong Message

Health & Environment
Media Watching

10.10 Ayers = Keating?

10.02 Project Censored's Media Democracy Advocacy

09.23 Satire: Louella Reads the Baltimore Sun

09.22 CBS Cheats on Tax Coverage

09.10 Post's Post-Convention 'Balancing' Act

09.10 McCain/Palin Campaign Relies on Lazy Thinking and Prejudice to Win

09.10 The Rising Cost of the Iraq 'Surge'

US Politics, Policy & Culture

10.09 McCain-Palin Put 'Country Last'

10.07 GOP Judges Aid White House Cover-up

10.07 Voting the Fate of the Nation

10.07 Alaska GOP's Last-Ditch Palin Defense

10.07 Election '08: Here Comes the Sludge

10.02 John McCain v. The Truth

10.02 Drinking at the Public Fountain

10.01 Who won the Mississippi debate? Obama—but for different reasons than you think

09.30 The Shadow of the Pitchfork: Elite Panic Attack as Bailout Goes Bust

09.29 The Resurrectionists: Beltway's Big Money Cultists Bail Out the Dead

09.29 We Have the Money

09.27 Debate Evades Dark Realities

09.26 Alaskan Officials Allege Palin Cover-up

09.24 Don’t Worry, Be Happy

09.24 Text of Draft Proposal for Bailout Plan

09.24 Hey, Government! How About Calling on Us?

09.23 Coming Attractions: War Without End, Amen

09.22 The Evolution of John McCain

09.21 Palin's 'Troopergate' Battle Rages

09.19 Burning the First Amendment

09.15 Subverting Democracy Through Electoral Fraud

09.15 Military Industrial Complex 2.0

09.13 Acceptable Sacrifice: For the Right to Endorse

09.13 Why More Soldiers from Alaska?

09.12 Experience is Over-Rated

09.10 Obama Must Call for Palin's Removal from the Ticket

09.10 9/11 Plus Seven

09.10 Palin's Strange Probe of a Trooper

09.10 Dear Democrats: Integrity Won’t Win this Election

US “High Crimes”

10.09 The Surge That Failed

10.08 The Orwellosphere: Anglo-American Drive to 'Total Security State' Rolls On

10.08 Justice for Yemini Sheik

10.06 The Wounded Shark: 'Good War' Lost, But the Imperial Project Goes On

10.02 U.S. Army Troops To Serve As U.S. Policemen?

09.25 Life on the Ledge

09.16 "Awakening" Into Nightmare: Seeding More Sectarian War in Iraq

Economics & Business

10.06 Thinking About Treason

10.06 The Fleecing of America

10.03 Can a bailout succeed?

10.02 Empire of Greed

10.02 No Surprise in the Senate Bailout Vote

10.02 How Wall Street Can Bail Itself Out Without Destroying The Dollar

10.02 The Specter of Wall Street

10.01 We Need to Demand Hearings!

09.30 Surprise! Congress Listened to the Voting Public!

09.29 Thinking About Gyrations

09.29 Grand Theft America

09.26 Seizing America by Withholding the Mother’s Milk of Politics

09.26 Framing the $700 Billion Question

09.26 Bail Out NO, Buy Out YES

09.26 Just Say "No" to Any Immediate Bailout

09.26 Has Deregulation Sired Fascism?

09.25 Don't Fuel the Fire: Fire the Arsonists

09.25 America Pays the Piper, Big Time

09.24 Just Thinking Aloud Here

09.23 What Nobody's Saying: The Bailout Will Kill the Dollar

09.22 Thinking About Escalations

09.18 US Economy: Rudderless and Reeling From Direct Hits

09.18 US Economy: Rudderless and Reeling From Direct Hits

09.17 Creative Destruction: The Solid Core Behind the Financial Crisis

09.16 You Can't Feel Blue About the Economy If You Want To. There Are No Blue Chips Anymore

09.15 Thinking About Spotlights

09.15 U.S. Economy—Temporary Respite, Permanent Decline

International

10.10 Another Israeli West Bank Land Grab Scheme

09.26 Annals of Liberation: Sex is Death in a Darkened Land

09.25 New Coup D'Etat Rumblings in Venezuela

09.22 Remembering Edward Said Five Years On

09.20 Filter Tips: Distortion and Demonization on the Iran Beat

09.11 Wall Street and Washington

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web
 
  Guardian at the Gates: Surging Toward War With Iran
Newspaper logo

COMMENTARY:

Guardian at the Gates: Surging Toward War With Iran

by Chris Floyd
If we have already gotten to the "al Qaeda alliance" stage -- the hottest of hot buttons, and one that will give ample cover to the many Democrats eager to show how bristlingly butch they are despite their lukewarm opposition to the "mishandled" Iraq war -- then the first laments of Iranian children being torn to shreds by falling bombs cannot be too far off.
Tuesday, 22 May 2007—If you have any doubt that the Bush Administration is planning a military strike against Iran, then check out the lead story in today's Guardian: Iran's secret plan for summer offensive to force US out of Iraq. The story, which is based entirely -- entirely -- on the unchallenged statements of three anonymous "American officials," not only alleges that Iran is "already committing daily acts of war against US and British forces" -- including the increasing mortar attacks on the Green Zone -- but also asserts that Tehran has entered into an active military alliance with al-Qaeda. Together, this new axis of evil will launch a "nationwide, Iranian-orchestrated summer offensive" aimed at undermining the scheduled September progress report from U.S. General David Petraeus on the vaunted "surge." Oh, and to top it all off, the same officials told the Guardian's stenographer, Simon Tisdall, that Iran has now also allied itself with its long-time enemy, the Taliban, and are helping kill Americans in Afghanistan as well.

To reiterate: the claim now from "top Bush officials" is that Iran has entered into an alliance with al Qaeda and is "committing daily acts of war" against American forces. As a casus belli, this beats the hell out of an "imminent threat" from undiscovered WMD, the entirely specious charge used by the Bush Faction to gull the nation into aggressive war with Iraq. In fact, at the time of that invasion, no Iraqi had killed an American in the 12 years since the first Gulf War; but here, we have the Bushists claiming that Iranians are killing Americans right this very minute -- every single day.

The clincher is the new charge that the Iranians are now actively allied with al Qaeda. It is by now a well-worn modus operandi of the Bush Terror Warriors simply to declare that anyone they don't like -- anyone who is a candidate for what Bush calls "the path of action" -- is an ally of al Qaeda. This is what was done in the last Terror War "regime change" aggression, in Somalia. And of course, this is what was done in the build-up to the Iraq invasion. At every turn, Bush explicitly equated the conflict with Saddam with the "war on terror," i.e., the fight against al Qaeda. "There is no difference," he said, over and over. Dick Cheney made the connection even more plainly, citing massaged intelligence and vaporous lies to tie Saddam to bin Laden. The message got through to the soldiers; as late as 2006, a majority of U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq believed that Saddam was connected to 9/11, and considered the invasion as "payback."

"Top Bush officials" claim that Iran has entered into an alliance with al Qaeda and is "committing daily acts of war" against American forces.
So now we have Iran being tied directly to al Qaeda -- in the middle of a shooting war in which Americans are indeed being killed every day, in a land of seething chaos and anarchy where the Iranians indeed have close and well-armed allies (ironically, these are the same sectarian parties which Bush himself has empowered and is now allied with), and where groups calling themselves "al Qaeda" are indeed killing people. You wouldn't need a "Curveball" or some forged Nigerian documents to gin up a nominally plausible provocation for war in such a scenario; you could do it any time you like. Many observers keep looking at the U.S. naval build-up in the Persian Gulf as a likely flashpoint -- and it's obvious that the Bushists are bellying around the Gulf like drunks at a bar, spoiling for a fight -- but it's on the ground, in the murk and blood and rape of Iraq, that the pretext is likely to arise.

Of course, the charges that Shiite Iran has joined forces with its deadly Sunni extremist foes, al Qaeda and the Taliban, are utterly ludicrous. As Juan Coles notes in his quick but effective demolition of "this silly article by poor Simon Tisdall," the new U.S. scenario would mean that the Iranians are now bombing their own allies who are in charge of the Green Zone, much of Baghdad and much of Basra and the south as well:

[The story] claims that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards are shelling the Green Zone. The parliament building that was hit today by such shelling is dominated by the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council and its paramilitary, the Badr Organization. Who trained Badr? The Iranian Revolutionary Guards. And they are trying to hit their own guys -- why? By the way, the US has 16,000 suspected insurgents in custody. Tisdall should ask how many of them are Iranian. (Hint: close to none. What, do they just run faster than the others?) The article even traffics in the ridiculous assertion that Iran is backing hyper-Sunni, Shiite-killing Taliban in Afghanistan. Why not just cut to the quick and openly say that Supreme Jurisprudent Ali Khamenei is in reality . . . Satan! It really is discouraging that Tisdall didn't report instead on what crazy things the US military spokesmen in Iraq told him. US military spokesmen have been trying to push implausible articles about Shiite Iran supporting Sunni insurgents for a couple of years now, and with virtually the sole exception of the New York Times, no one in the journalistic community has taken these wild charges seriously. But The Guardian?
Yes, the Guardian. Cole is rightly dismissive of "this silly article," but its silliness, its credulous stupidity, doesn't mean it can't have serious and sinister ramifications. Just as the New York Times was used to "launder" the Bushists' warmongering propaganda on Iraq into "straight news" -- from the leader of the "liberal media," no less! -- so too the Guardian makes an ideal patsy for fomenting war fever against Iran. On Iraq, Bush and Cheney solemnly cited the scary stories their own minions had planted in the Times, now they can refer to the stories in Guardian as proof of the reality of Iran's "acts of war" against the United States. In fact, the Guardian's reputation as a left-wing, even "socialist" paper makes it even more effective in this regard. You can see Cheney now, sitting down with that "useful" talking head, Tim Russert, and intoning gravely, "Look, Tim, it's not just me, not just the Administration saying this. It's even in radical, foreign papers like the Guardian -- which, as you know, holds no love for this administration. Why, the Guardian reported today that Iran has been...."

Looking at the story on-line -- as Cole did, presumably, and as will the vast majority of American readers -- does not convey the lurid setting that the Guardian's print edition gives to the story. From every newsstand in Britain, you can see the large, double-decked banner headlines screaming of Iran's plans for a summer offensive -- with no quote marks, no qualifications, just a bald statement of fact. The headlines stream across the page underneath a full-length picture of a smoldering Bradley armored car that has just been destroyed by a roadside bomb. (Supplied -- or even planted! -- by those dastardly Iranians, no doubt.) In terms of its visuals, and the unsubtle message conveyed to passers-by and casual readers by the headlines and photo, the Guardian piece is a far more garish and effective piece of propaganda than any pre-Iraq War story that appeared in the staid New York Times.

So we should not be surprised to see the Guardian story blowing back across the water to be milked by the Administration and its many outside agitators for another act of aggression. But beyond its utility as a bloody shirt, the story is also important for the insight it provides on how the Bushists are laying the groundwork for the attack on Iran -- and how far along they are in the warmongering campaign. If we have already gotten to the "al Qaeda alliance" stage -- the hottest of hot buttons, and one that will give ample cover to the many Democrats eager to show how bristlingly butch they are despite their lukewarm opposition to the "mishandled" Iraq war -- then the first laments of Iranian children being torn to shreds by falling bombs cannot be too far off.


Chris Floyd is an American journalist. His work has appeared in print and online in venues all over the world, including the Nation, CounterPunch, Columbia Journalism Review, the Christian Science Monitor, Il Manifesto, the Moscow Times and many others. He is the author of Empire Burlesque: High Crimes and Low Comedy in the Bush Imperium, and is co-founder and editor of the "Empire Burlesque" political blog. He can be reached at cfloyd72@gmail.com.

This column originally appeared on Chris Floyd's site, and is republished here with the permission of the author.



Copyright © 2007 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on May 23, 2007.
 

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland