Newspaper logo  
 
 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Local Newsbriefs

Travel
Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

06.24 Mr. Holder, You Must Hold Torturers Accountable

Health & Environment

06.29 Thinking about Climate

06.26 False Health-Scare Ad on CNN

06.25 Louella Learns the Limits of Medicare

06.23 The Simple Answer to America’s Health Care Crisis: Medicare for All

06.23 Tell ABC: Include Single-Payer in Healthcare Debate

06.23 Serving the Medical-Industrial Complex

06.22 Thinking about Recoveries

06.20 Obama's Health Care Waterloo

06.15 Obama, Like Clinton Before Him, is Blowing the Chance for Real Health Care Reform

06.11 Two Key Health-Care Numbers

06.10 Big Breakthroughs for Single Payer Health Care

06.10 Readying Americans for Dangerous, Mandatory Vaccinations

Media Watching

06.29 WP's Connolly Back, on Health Reform

06.17 Hypocrisy and Hope: Western Coverage, Iranian Courage

06.15 Excusing Outrages of the Right

06.11 Tying Obama to Bush's Budget Mess

US Politics, Policy & Culture

06.30 Obama's Torture Hypocrisy

06.30 Court Circular: Annals of Imperial Continuity

06.29 Obama, They Want You to Fail

06.26 Who to Trust on a Truth Commission?

06.26 Tarnished Shields: The Morally Bankrupt 'Family Values' Republican Leadership

06.25 America's "Bases of Empire"

06.24 Twelve Angry White People: Jury Nullification in a Pennsylvania Coal Town

06.24 Touring Empire's Ruins

06.23 Employers are Undermining the Economic Stimulus Program

06.19 Criminalizing Dissent: Obama Pot Calls Iranian Kettle Black

06.17 Afghanistan's Operation Phoenix

06.16 Are You Ready for War with a Demonized Iran?

06.13 Where's the Anger as the Wheels Come Off Obama's and the Democrats' Recovery Program?

06.10 Waiving the Rules for Old Glory

06.10 Obama's Era of Openness Is Closed

“High Crimes?”

07.03 Reviewing Marjorie Cohn and Kathleen Gilberd's "Rules of Disengagement"

07.01 Iraq: A Bitter Strategic Failure

06.25 It's All Good, Again: 'Uptick' in the American-Made Tides of Violence in Iraq

06.22 Obama Opposes Plame-gate Release

06.21 Dexter's Legions: The "Good" Killers of the "Good" War

06.18 Extending the Tradition: Proudly Taking American Torture Into the Future

06.15 New UN Report Denounces America's Human Rights Record

06.14 Fear Rules

Economics & Business Non/Mis/Malfeasance

07.01 Michael Hudson's "Super Imperialism:" The Economic Strategy of Imperial America

06.23 Obama's Financial Reform Proposal - A Stealth Scheme for Global Monetary Control

06.10 Cyberscares About Cyberwars Equal Cybermoney

International

07.01 Pirates of the Mediterranean

06.29 Color Revolutions, Old and New

06.25 Iran Divided & the 'October Suprise'

06.23 Astringent Corrective: AbuKhalil on Iran's Turmoil

06.22 Reviewing F. William Engdahl's "Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order:" Part I

06.20 Are the Iranian Protests Another US Orchestrated “Color Revolution?”

06.20 Through a Glass Darkly: Sifting Myth and Fact on Iran

06.19 Iran's Election and US - Iranian Elections

06.16 The Ir-Af-Pak War: Obama Looses the Manhunters

06.12 Israeli War Crimes Against Children During Operation Cast Lead

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web
  Wrong on So Many Levels
Newspaper logo

ON THE SOAPBOX:

Wrong on So Many Levels

by Lynda Lambert
The U.S. Navy's plan to build an airfield in rural North Carolina would disrupt the ecology of migratory birds, destroy the economy of a small town, and possibly put pilots in danger. If it weren’t so tragic, this could be a comedy skit on "Saturday Night Live."
On Friday, April 27, 2007, on NPR (WYPR), Elizabeth Shogren reported on "All Things Considered" that the U.S. Navy wants to build a landing strip. Why they want to build it, where they want to build it, and how they want to build it are so wrong on so many levels that it’s hard to know where to start.

Let’s start with "why?"

They want to build it, according to the report, to teach young pilots how to land on aircraft carriers. Now, if you’ve ever seen planes land on aircraft carriers, you know that the biggest problem with landing is the sea. The carriers pitch and roll. A plane may start its run at the landing strip and it will suddenly sink out from under it, as the ship dips down behind a wave.

So, "where" does the Navy want to build this practice landing strip? On water? Certainly not.

On land. (Of course.) Stable, never-moving, flat as a table... land.

And what land have they chosen? Fifty square miles in the middle of fertile wheat- and vegetable-producing North Carolina—right next to a bird sanctuary to which 80,000 snow geese and thousands of Tundra Swans migrate from Greenland and Alaska, respectively, every winter.

Joe Albea, who was interviewed for the piece by Shogren, noted that the Tundra Swans can weigh up to 24 pounds; and Bunny Sanders, who spoke in opposition to the airfield at a public meeting, noted that these birds have 7-foot wingspans. (Think of that crashing into the jet engine of a plane going supersonic speeds!)

Of course, this massive population of massive birds does not worry the Navy. Apparently, if all else fails—e.g., if taking away their food source, shooting off cannons, and chasing the birds with dogs fails—then the Navy is prepared to poison them. (How’s that for an "inconvenient truth"?)

If that were not enough, the land the Navy plans to claim as their own belongs to small working farmers to whom it has belonged for centuries. And the little town of Plymouth and the Pocosin National Wildlife Refuge that surround it rely on the nature lovers and birders who come every year to see the magnificent display.

So... obviously... The town doesn’t want it. The bird sanctuary doesn’t want it. The farmers don’t want it. The two senators and the governor of North Carolina have said "no." Even the the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service opposes it. But, according to the report, the Navy is "weighing all comments."

Un-be-lieve-a-ble! What is there to weigh? It’s plainly a stupid idea.

The Navy wants to disrupt the ecology of the migratory birds, the economy of the town, and possibly put pilots in danger by creating an airfield that in no way simulates the environment they say they’re training their pilots for.

If it weren’t so tragic, it would be a comedy skit on "Saturday Night Live."

If they want to simulate the deck of an aircraft carrier, I suggest they find a piece of the Atlantic that no one’s using and build a platform. Or, better yet, call up Steve Jobs and ask him to create a simulator—which would do a much better job at training and not risk the life of one pilot or one bird.

I urge you to email your senators and congressmen, and, spend the stamp to write Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary of the Navy, 1000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20350-1000. Support the little town of Plymouth, NC. Tell the powers-that-be that you don’t want your tax money spent to destroy a community and an entire migratory bird population for a useless airfield.


For the full NPR story, click here.

Lynda Lambert, a college English instructor, writes from Baltimore.



Copyright © 2007 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on May 5, 2007.
 

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland