| ||||||||||||||
|
Local News & Opinion
Ref. : Local Newsbriefs Travel
Letters
Ref. : Letters to the editor Open Letters:
03.05 Open Letter to Congressman Bart Stupak Health & Environment
Video National Health Care Systems In Other Countries 03.18 Pressure Drop: Brave Sir Dennis Ran Away 03.12 Slick Barry and the $100-Billion Medicaid/Medicare Fraud Claim 03.09 Kill Bill: Death to Obamacare! 03.09 Obama’s Rhetoric May Be “Fiery,” But His Health Care Reform Is Still Lukewarm Media Watching
03.17 CNN Scrapes Bottom of Right-Wing Barrel With Erickson Hire 03.16 WPost Blames Obama First, on Israel 03.16 Letter to the New York Times' Editor: Stovepiping To Persia 03.12 Cud and Complicity: Burying the Alternatives to Empire's Dominion 03.11 NYT and the ACORN Hoax 03.05 Sorry, Rove, Bush Did Lie About Iraq 03.03 It's Snow News 03.03 The Woeful Washington Post Ref. : The Daily Howler Legal Matters
02.26 America's Supremes: Court Over Constitution US Politics, Policy & Culture
03.11 Power Rangers: Policing the System With the "Fightin' Progressives" 03.09 Thinking About Countings 03.07 Unnatural Acts: Breaking the Fever of Militarism 02.25 Future Shock: A Better World Beyond the Imperium High Crimes?
03.18 The Lawfare Project's Anti-Democratic Agenda 03.16 America's Secret Prisons 03.13 Palestinian Dispossession in East Jerusalem 03.12 Israeli Settlement Expansions Continue 03.11 Brutalizing Palestinian Children 03.08 The Russell Tribunal on Palestine: Barcelona Session 03.05 Targeting Israeli Apartheid 03.01 America's Permanent War Agenda 02.25 Global Sweatshop Wage Slavery Economics & Business Non/Mis/Malfeasance
03.14 The Crisis in America's Telecommunications Network 03.09 The Business of Water: Privatizing An Essential Resource 03.05 Is the Recovery Real? 03.04 IMF-Style Austerity Measures come to America: What “Fiscal Responsibility” Means To You 03.04 Barry C. Lynn's "Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and Economics of Destruction" 03.01 Thinking About Fees International
03.15 Peace Process Hypocrisy: Stillborn from Inception 03.03 Muslim Disunity 03.02 Funding Israeli Militarism, Belligerence and Occupation 02.26 Iran Captures a 'Good' Terrorist We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
|
ON THE SOAPBOX:Wrong on So Many LevelsThe U.S. Navy's plan to build an airfield in rural North Carolina would disrupt the ecology of migratory birds, destroy the economy of a small town, and possibly put pilots in danger. If it weren’t so tragic, this could be a comedy skit on "Saturday Night Live."
On Friday, April 27, 2007, on NPR (WYPR), Elizabeth Shogren reported on "All Things Considered" that the U.S. Navy wants to build a landing strip. Why they want to build it, where they want to build it, and how they want to build it are so wrong on so many levels that it’s hard to know where to start.Let’s start with "why?"
So, "where" does the Navy want to build this practice landing strip? On water? Certainly not. On land. (Of course.) Stable, never-moving, flat as a table... land. And what land have they chosen? Fifty square miles in the middle of fertile wheat- and vegetable-producing North Carolina—right next to a bird sanctuary to which 80,000 snow geese and thousands of Tundra Swans migrate from Greenland and Alaska, respectively, every winter. Joe Albea, who was interviewed for the piece by Shogren, noted that the Tundra Swans can weigh up to 24 pounds; and Bunny Sanders, who spoke in opposition to the airfield at a public meeting, noted that these birds have 7-foot wingspans. (Think of that crashing into the jet engine of a plane going supersonic speeds!) Of course, this massive population of massive birds does not worry the Navy. Apparently, if all else fails—e.g., if taking away their food source, shooting off cannons, and chasing the birds with dogs fails—then the Navy is prepared to poison them. (How’s that for an "inconvenient truth"?) If that were not enough, the land the Navy plans to claim as their own belongs to small working farmers to whom it has belonged for centuries. And the little town of Plymouth and the Pocosin National Wildlife Refuge that surround it rely on the nature lovers and birders who come every year to see the magnificent display. So... obviously... The town doesn’t want it. The bird sanctuary doesn’t want it. The farmers don’t want it. The two senators and the governor of North Carolina have said "no." Even the the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service opposes it. But, according to the report, the Navy is "weighing all comments." Un-be-lieve-a-ble! What is there to weigh? It’s plainly a stupid idea. The Navy wants to disrupt the ecology of the migratory birds, the economy of the town, and possibly put pilots in danger by creating an airfield that in no way simulates the environment they say they’re training their pilots for. If it weren’t so tragic, it would be a comedy skit on "Saturday Night Live." If they want to simulate the deck of an aircraft carrier, I suggest they find a piece of the Atlantic that no one’s using and build a platform. Or, better yet, call up Steve Jobs and ask him to create a simulator—which would do a much better job at training and not risk the life of one pilot or one bird. I urge you to email your senators and congressmen, and, spend the stamp to write Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary of the Navy, 1000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20350-1000. Support the little town of Plymouth, NC. Tell the powers-that-be that you don’t want your tax money spent to destroy a community and an entire migratory bird population for a useless airfield. For the full NPR story, click here.
Lynda Lambert, a college English instructor, writes from Baltimore. Copyright © 2007 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent. This story was published on May 5, 2007. |
| ||||||||||||