| ||||||||||||||
|
Local News & Opinion
Ref.: Civic Events Ref.: Arts & Education Events Ref.: Public Service Notices Travel
01.13 Hawaii, the Unique State Books, Films, Arts & Education
01.24 Can Apple “Rescue” US Education? (Graphics) 01.23 What You (Really) Need to Know 01.22 How to Forecast Weather Infographic w/Simple Explanations Letters
Ref. : Letters to the editor Health Care & Environment
02.03 Obama Won't Touch Climate With a 10-Foot Pole 02.03 Komen reverses decision to cut Planned Parenthood funding 02.03 Reforming EU Deep-Sea Fisheries Management 02.02 By defunding Planned Parenthood, the Susan G Komen Foundation betrays women 02.02 Ohio Tries to Escape Fate as a Dumping Ground for Fracking Fluid 01.31 Eleanor Smeal dissects Obama vs. Catholic Church controversy over birth control coverage - video 01.30 Scientists Call on Obama Administration to Use Science as Guide for Arctic 01.28 Universal health care proposal stalls in California Senate 01.27 Apple, Electronics and Environmental Ills 01.25 Solar Cheaper Than Diesel Making India’s Mittal Believer: Energy 01.24 Sounding an Alarm on Birds and Mercury 01.24 Why Don’t We Have Abundant Solar Power? Blame Financing, and Industry, not Science 01.22 The Money Traps in U.S. Health Care 01.22 Looking Inside the Twinkie Ref. Dollars for Doctors - How Industry Money Reaches Physicians Ref. 2010 Comparative Price Report Medical and Hospital Fees by Country - Graphics Ref. Health at a Glance 2011 - OECD Indicators Ref. : Why is Healthcare Absurdly Expensive in USA (Part 2) [Graphics] (Part 1 is here) Video Health Care Systems in Less Corrupt Countries “News” Media
02.02 ABC's Iran Propaganda 02.02 The Ongoing “Foxification” of the Wall Street Journal 01.30 While temperatures rise, denialists reach lower 01.29 Fox News psychiatrist: Newt Gingrich's affairs 'mean he might make a strong president' 01.22 ‘Shocking victory’: With SOPA shelved, Markos Moulitsas on a way forward for Internet policy - video Daily The Daily Howler Justice Matters
02.03 Senate Votes To Ban Its Members From Insider Trading... Kind Of 01.31 Senate clears way for vote on insider-trading ban 01.25 Why all the robo-signing? Shedding light on the shadow banking system 01.25 In Iraq, Haditha case is reminder of justice denied 01.22 Still Not Clear on SOPA & PIPA? Infographic w/Simple Explanations US Politics, Policy & Culture
02.03 SUPERBOWL XLVI: Are You Ready for Some Football??? 02.03 Buffett rules: Sheldon Whitehouse introduces the Paying a Fair Share Act - video 02.02 Secrecy Shrouds ‘Super PAC’ Funds in Latest Filings 02.01 Rich Patrons Are Major Source of Romney’s Cash 01.31 How Newt Gingrich Crippled Congress 01.30 Corporate Rule Is Not Inevitable 01.30 Clashes in Oakland: 400 Arrests, Tear Gas, Flash-Bang Grenades 01.30 A European look at the US primaries - video 01.29 Obama’s Faux Populism Sounds Like Bill Clinton 01.25 Inside Romney’s Tax Returns: A Reading Guide 01.24 ILLUSIONS: Being Led Down the Primrose Path...??? 01.24 Science Bulletins: Whales Give Dolphins a Lift - video 01.24 THE OBAMA MEMOS 01.22 Three Takeaways From South Carolina High Crimes?
Economics, Gov't. & Business
02.03 PRIVATE INEQUITY 02.02 The New American Divide 02.02 American Airlines proposes to end all four pension plans 02.01 Economics 101 01.30 New Strategy, Old Pentagon Budget 01.30 Where Did All the Workers Go? 60 Years of Economic Change in 1 Graph 01.29 The Apple Boycott: People Are Spouting Nonsense about Chinese Manufacturing 01.29 Made in the World 01.28 Sugar daddy Adelson could save $500 million in taxes if his boy Gingrich wins - video 01.28 How Swedes and Norwegians broke the power of the ‘1 percent’ 01.27 Unemployment in Spain Rises to 22.9% 01.27 Chinese Company Continues Plan To Replace Workforce With 500,000 Robots 01.27 Details Emerge of New Financial Fraud Unit 01.27 Not all jobs are equal 01.27 The Shift from Manufacturing to Service Economy - Graphic 01.25 Billionaires Occupy Davos as 0.01% Bemoan Inequality 01.24 Germany has the economic strengths America once boasted 01.23 State Capitalism: The visible hand 01.22 How Big Money Bought Our Democracy, Corrupted Both Parties, and Set Us Up for Another Financial Crisis - video 01.22 How U.S. lost out on Apple's iPhone work International
02.03 What the Occupy movement must learn from Sundance 02.02 US plans to halt Afghan combat role early surprise Kabul 01.31 TABLE TALK 01.30 With its deadly drones, the US is fighting a coward's war 01.30 UN panel aims for 'a future worth choosing' 01.26 Iran is ready to return to nuclear talks 01.24 Reagan’s Hand in Guatemala’s Genocide We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
You can also mail a check to: Baltimore News Network, Inc. P.O. Box 42581 Baltimore, MD 21284-2581 |
Commentary:Muslim-Bashing and the Power of Cartoons
Shame on the European newspapers for publishing grossly disrespectful cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), the founder of Islam. One of the original 12 cartoons, which were all first published in a Danish tabloid in Sept., 2005, showed him wearing a turban shaped like a bomb with a burning fuse. Some of the offensive cartoons were then reprinted in other newspapers in European countries. How would Christians like it if someone showed Jesus, the "Prince of Peace," with an H-bomb in one of his hands? Or, how about a cartoon with the Jewish G-d, Yahweh, depicted with Uzi machine guns coming out of his yarmulke? Or, what about the Buddha being displayed in a drawing as sitting on a park bench puffing away on a cigar made of anthrax? I don't think those kinds of insulting images would ever see the light of day in any establishment-owned publication in the U.S.--even one controlled by the Evil Media Empire of Rupert Murdoch.Did the Danish and other European newspapers have a "right" to publish/reprint the provocative cartoons in question? Yes, they did. But, it was in the worst kind of taste for them to do so. And, by doing it, they abused their right of free expression. Did the Danish and other European newspapers have a "right" to publish/reprint the provocative cartoons in question? Yes, they did. But, it was in the worst kind of taste for them to do so. And, by doing it, they abused their right of free expression. The parties responsible should offer sincere apologies to those whose feelings they have so cavalierly offended. What was the point of these galling Muslim-bashing images, anyway? I think it was an attempt to demonize all Muslims--to dehumanize them. It was a political statement by the creators/editors of the disputed cartoons. They wanted their viewers to believe that "all" Muslims are violent and that all Muslims are violence-prone. The cartoons were an invitation for their readers to hate Muslims. Is that what the owners of those newspapers really wanted? I hope not! It is one thing for a political cartoon to demonize the still missing-in-action Osama bin Laden. He's fair game, as are the other al-Qaeda firebrands. It is quite another thing, however, to hold up to ridicule the revered founder of Islam, the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). The public distortion of his image brings a whole people, one billion faithful followers, into disrepute. Now, having said all of the above, I also think it's wrong for anyone insulted by the cartoons in controversy to take revenge, especially on any innocent third party. This would be like a Canadian getting back at an American for something crass that was written by that repulsive Neocon, Jonah Goldberg. It was Goldberg who suggested, in 2002, that the U.S. should "bomb Canada," because it wasn't bloodthirsty enough to suit his need for mayhem. Also, in 2003, he called the French "liars." Goldberg's stupid comments were protected by the First Amendment. That didn't mean they were the right things for him to write; nor did it signal that Americans should be blamed for his ignorance. I think it's unfair for a cartoonist, or a political pundit, to demonize an entire class, or group, of people. This is going on today with respect to how elements of the U.S. media are negatively portraying the Hamas organization in Israeli-Occupied Palestine. If you don't believe me, just read any of the recent scurrilous editorials from the Murdock-owned NY Post. I can't forget, too, how another Neocon ranter, Mona Charen, viciously labeled those who protested in Washington, D.C., against any war with Iraq as supporting "Islamo fascists and their enablers." As far as I know, Charen has never heard a shot fired in Iraq, nor to my knowledge has she bothered to visit the U.S. wounded at Walter Reed Hospital. Political cartooning in the U.S. can trace its lineage to colonial days. Rarely, if ever, did a cartoonist dare to go after an organized religion. There were exceptions. One of the favorite targets of the lampooners back then was, naturally, the British tyrant, George III, head of both the Church of England and the State. He took a beating from the patriots of old. The Sons of Liberty had a field day pulverizing the image/icon of the British monarch. On July 6, 1776, they destroyed his statue in New York City. The man in the U.S., however, who put his name on the craft of political cartooning as we know it today, was the legendary Thomas Nast--a German by birth. His repeated attacks, in the late 19th century, on NYC's "Boss" William Marcy Tweed and his Tammany Hall-related rackets led to the downfall of the once-mighty politico. Nast, however, had a darker side. He despised Roman Catholics, particularly the Irish, many of whom were recent immigrants to America. He regularly depicted them as brutal, Simian-like creatures, (6) controlled by their local priests, who in turn were nothing more than puppets for Nast's arch -villain--the Vatican. Nast was very good at what he did, but his anti-Catholic, anti-Irish legacy is hard to overlook or to forgive. He was a demonizer of an entire class of people, and that kind of cartooning, thankfully, wouldn't pass muster in today's America. Unfortunately, I can't say the same for what's going on in Denmark, et al. All of this brings me to the late Herb Block. He was a very talented cartoonist for the Washington Post for many years. He took a mostly liberal position on domestic issues, but he had a Global Cop point of view about America in the world. Block's cartoons reveal that he was a crafty warmonger at heart, even before Pearl Harbor. He did everything that he could in the '30s to get the U.S. involved in a European conflict. Americans who wanted to stay out of any such conflict were tagged "isolationists" by Block in his demeaning cartoons. When the horrific war finally did start on Dec. 7, 1941, he failed to join the military, but waited until 1943 to be drafted in the U.S. Army. Even then, he didn't rush to serve on the front lines against the Fascists in Europe. Instead, he was content to leave the fighting to others, while he produced and edited a "clip sheet" for the Army's newspapers. From time to time after WWII, Block also used his caustic pen to reduce to a caricature entire ethnic groups, like the Arabs. Another thing I think is interesting about the body of Block's work is this: Whom he didn't satirize! Where were his cartoons on the excesses of the Zionists? In the Middle East, the late Palestinian chief Yassar Arafat was one of his favorite targets for abuse, but never an Israeli leader. Block was an expert at his craft, but he was also very selective about whom he lampooned. And anytime somebody is around in that kind of influential editorializing field for over 50 years, like he was, it means that he or she was sucking up to the wire-pullers behind the scene. For a wider perspective on the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), it is worth knowing that, in the Holy Qur'an, this mystical-oriented man, who was also a teacher, statesman, poet, judge and warrior, honored both Jesus and the Jews, too, because they were a prophetic people. According to the noted scholar, Adolf Von Harnack, the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) may have been influenced earlier in his mission by the teachings of Gnostic Judaeo-Christian sects that had flourished in Arabia a century before his birth. In any event, may the day come when all the great religions of the world, wake up to the deeper meanings that are found in their creeds and to the oneness in spirit of Humankind. Hopefully, that needed awakening will unite us all, before we rip ourselves apart and destroy our planet. © William Hughes 2006. Hughes is the author of Saying ‘’No’ to the War Party (IUniverse, Inc.). He can be reached at liamhughes@comcast.net.
Copyright © 2006 The Baltimore Chronicle.
All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent. This story was published on February 7, 2006. |
| ||||||||||||