Newspaper logo  
 
 
  U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to Open up 11,000 Acres of Wetlands in 15 States

REPORT:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to Open up 11,000 Acres of Wetlands in 15 States

Total Wetlands Area in Question is 5 Times Bigger Than Drillable Portion of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

SOURCE: Environmental Integrity Project
A wide range of commercial interests will benefit from recent determinations by the Corps' wetlands-related decisions, including a Wal-Mart shopping center in Texas, a titanium sand mine in Georgia, a peat bog mine in Florida, and, in several states, residential development and golf courses.
WASHINGTON, D.C., September 15, 2005--After decades of slowing down, the loss of United States wetlands that are home to migratory birds and endangered species may start climbing again, following decisions by the US Army Corps of Engineers to open up 11,000-15,000 acres of wetlands in 15 states since 2004 in the aftermath of a Supreme Court decision narrowing Clean Water Act protections, according to an analysis conducted by the nonprofit and nonpartisan Environmental Integrity Project (EIP).

Nearly five years ago, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the Clean Water Act did not protect so-called “isolated” wetlands that provide critical habitat for migratory birds. The 15 states with the most wetlands exempted by the Corps’ aggressive implementation of that decision since 2004 are: Nebraska (2,970-3,139 acres); North Dakota (2,134-2,474 acres); Florida (1,699-1,884 acres); Illinois (643-1,332 acres); Texas (642-887 acres); Georgia (539-1,104 acres); South Dakota (479-704 acres); Colorado (469-872 acres); Wisconsin (434-641 acres); Indiana (407-645 acres); Ohio (259-325 acres); California (215-344 acres); Minnesota (169-356 acres); Iowa (150-274 acres); and New York (140-205 acres).

Even at the low-end estimate of 11,000 acres of wetlands opened to potential exploitation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the area in question is more than five times larger than the 2,000 acres that proponents of oil exploration in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) claim that they need for actual drilling purposes.

EIP Director Eric Schaeffer said, in a prepared statement to the press, “By a narrow majority, the Supreme Court voted to shrink the Clean Water Act and opened thousands of acres of wetlands to commercial development. Disappearing wetlands increase the risk of flooding, threaten the survival of migrating birds and endangered species, and diminish the environment for outdoor lovers and sportsmen. Developers are going to keep attacking the Clean Water Act, and the public should understand that the new Supreme Court has the power to determine whether our wetlands live or die.”

Once the Corps decides that the Clean Water Act no longer applies, the wetland at issue are completely vulnerable to being carved up by commercial interests.

EIP found that a wide range of commercial interests will benefit from recent determinations by the Corps' wetlands-related decisions, including a Wal-Mart shopping center in Texas, a titanium sand mine in Georgia, a peat bog mine in Florida, and, in several states, residential development and golf courses. The fact that the Corps has determined a wetland is exempt from the Clean Water Act does not necessarily mean that all of the acreage in question will be destroyed. Developers may choose to preserve some for aesthetic reasons, and in a few instances, state or local regulation could help to fill the void left by the Corps. But in the vast majority of cases, once the Corps decides that the Clean Water Act no longer applies, the wetland at issue are completely vulnerable to being carved up by commercial interests.

Highlights of the EIP report include the following findings:
  • An apparent bias against wetlands preservation. In at least one state, nearly all of the wetlands reviewed by the Corps so far have been found to be exempt from the Clean Water Act. For example, the Corps found that the affected wetlands in North Dakota were exempt in 69 of the 77 projects it has reviewed since March 30, 1977. Wetlands were determined to be exempt in 54 out of 125 cases reviewed in South Dakota since April 27, 2004. Both states are home to home to “prairie potholes” and other wetlands that provide critical habitat for waterfowl that migrate between Canada and our southern states.

  • Writing off of wetlands that provide habitat for endangered species. Endangered species were present, or thought to be present, in about 15 percent of the cases in which the Corps determined that wetlands were no longer covered by the Clean Water Act. In many other cases, the Corps simply did not know. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that about a third of endangered species live their entire lives within wetlands.

  • Discounting the input of sport fishermen. In at least one instance, the Sacramento district office of the Army Corps tried to present data showing that California’s 38 mile Poso Creek was subject to the Clean Water Act, in part because it supported recreational fisheries. The Corps’ Washington office refused to consider this evidence, and the creek and its watershed are not longer protected under the Clean Water Act. Poso Creek flows only intermittently today because it has been dammed and diverted for many years. As a consequence, the Kern National Wildlife Refuge into which it flows is suffering from a drought that threatens to extinguish one or more endangered species.

  • Underestimating wetlands destruction. For example, the Corps district office in Galveston, Texas, did not know the size or even the location of some of the wetlands it has determined are no longer subject to the Clean Water Act. In at least 34 cases in other states, the Corps reported that the “isolated” wetlands exceeded 50 acres, but did not know their full extent. Most importantly, the data do not include the large number of development projects undertaken every year by private interests without any Corps’ review.

  • Losses to other than traditional wetlands. The Corps decisions also reach other waters that the Corps believes were “isolated” from the Clean Water Act under court rulings. In California, a 38-mile creek was declared an unprotected “isolated water,” even though it drained to a national wildlife refuge suffering from drought. The mudflats of China Lake in California cover many square miles, but were judged “isolated” under SWANCC.

As the EIP report notes, the United State has lost more than half its native wetlands since European settlement began. Wetland losses averaged 300,000 acres a year in the late 1970s and early 1980s, according to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, but slowed to about 60,000 acres a year in the late 1990s, thanks to a combination of Clean Water Act regulation and voluntary incentives for conservation.

While the Supreme Court’s opinion was limited to “isolated” wetlands that are home to migratory birds, the Corps has gone further in many cases by dismissing wetlands without considering other benefits. Schaeffer said: “As bad as the Supreme Court decision was, the Army Corps has made it worse by going further than the opinion required. President Bush has pledged to support 'no net loss of wetlands.' But the Corps’ decisions to remove wetlands from the Clean Water Act in so many cases speak louder than words.”


The Environmental Integrity Project is a non-profit non-partisan organization dedicated to stronger enforcement of existing federal and state anti-pollution laws, and to the prevention of political interference with those laws. EIP's research and reports shed light on how enforcement and rulemaking affect public health. It also works with communities seeking enforcement of environmental laws.


Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on September 16, 2005.

 
Bookmark and Share
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Local Newsbriefs

Travel
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

03.05 Open Letter to Congressman Bart Stupak

Health & Environment

Video National Health Care Systems In Other Countries

03.09 Kill Bill: Death to Obamacare!

03.09 Obama’s Rhetoric May Be “Fiery,” But His Health Care Reform Is Still Lukewarm

02.24 Obama’s New Plan

02.21 Time to Pass the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009

Media Watching

03.11 NYT and the ACORN Hoax

03.05 Sorry, Rove, Bush Did Lie About Iraq

03.03 It's Snow News

03.03 The Woeful Washington Post

02.28 The NYT Veers Neocon

02.18 US Media Replays Iraq Fiasco on Iran

Ref. : The Daily Howler

Legal Matters

02.26 America's Supremes: Court Over Constitution

US Politics, Policy & Culture

03.11 Power Rangers: Policing the System With the "Fightin' Progressives"

03.09 Thinking About Countings

03.07 Unnatural Acts: Breaking the Fever of Militarism

02.25 Future Shock: A Better World Beyond the Imperium

02.24 The Last Flight of Joe Stack

02.22 Thinking About Sadie

02.18 All Systems Go: No Dysfunction in Profitable Afghan Enterprise

“High Crimes?”

03.11 Brutalizing Palestinian Children

03.08 The Russell Tribunal on Palestine: Barcelona Session

03.01 America's Permanent War Agenda

02.25 Global Sweatshop Wage Slavery

02.23 Israeli Unaccountability and Denial: Suppressing the Practice of Torture

02.22 American Genocides: is Haiti Next?

02.16 MK-ULTRA: The CIA's Mind Control Program

Economics & Business Non/Mis/Malfeasance

03.09 The Business of Water: Privatizing An Essential Resource

03.05 Is the Recovery Real?

03.04 IMF-Style Austerity Measures come to America: What “Fiscal Responsibility” Means To You

03.04 Barry C. Lynn's "Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and Economics of Destruction"

03.02 Obama's Budget Revealed: Money for Wars and Weapons, While More Americans Face Joblessness and Hunger

03.01 Thinking About Fees

02.22 Campaigning for State-Owned Banks

02.22 Social Security Will Fall To Obama Before The Taliban Do

02.19 Obama’s Stealth Entitlement Commission

02.19 Selling Out America to Wall Street

International

03.05 Targeting Israeli Apartheid

03.03 Muslim Disunity

03.02 Funding Israeli Militarism, Belligerence and Occupation

02.26 Iran Captures a 'Good' Terrorist

02.24 The Dubai Hit

02.22 Holland Has Had Enough: Killing of Innocent Civilians Goes On Apace in Afghanistan

02.19 The Placeman Cometh: New IAEA Chief Stokes Iran War Fever for the Bush-Obama Regime

02.18 Israeli Abusive Administrative Detentions

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland