Newspaper logo  
 
 
  Will US Senate Dare to Raise the Debt Ceiling Before the Election?

FISCAL COMMENTARY:

Will US Senate Dare to Raise the Debt Ceiling Before the Election?

by Fred Cederholm

A budget resolution passed the House in May 2004, hiking the debt ceiling by another $690 billion to nearly $8.1 trillion. If the Senate concurs, Federal debt could thus "grow" by 26 percent in just two years.
I've been thinking about our national debt, and the so-called safeguard/control placed on it by the legal constraint of the "debt ceiling." You see, the US Treasury cannot extend its borrowing beyond the maximum dollar amount approved by Congress and signed off by the President. This was supposed to be a check and a balance.

As of August 31, 2004, the approved debt ceiling stood at $7,384,000,000,000. (See SUMMARY OF TREASURY SECURITIES OUTSTANDING, AUGUST 31, 2004 ). Congress approved an increase to the ceiling of $984,000,000,000 in 2003 - after already approving an increase of $450,000,000,000 in 2002. The "so called Clinton surpluses" were history--they, like the huge "peace dividend surpluses" projected (from defense savings) after the break-up of the former Soviet Union--were aborted shortly after their mythical conceptions via tax cuts and increased spending.

Treasury Secretary Snow has been calling for another debt ceiling increase all summer. A budget resolution passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 216-213 in May of 2004. This resolution proposed hiking the ceiling by another $690 billion to nearly $8.1 trillion on top of the $450 billion increase for fiscal 2003 and the $984 billion increase for fiscal 2004. Federal debt could thus "grow" by 26 percent in two years. It seems the Senate has yet to approve the measure--unless the increase was buried as a rider to another omnibus bill, and "approved incognito." That does not appear the case, and Bush certainly hasn't publicly signed off on it.

No Congress or Presidential Administration ever likes to approve increasing the debt ceiling, because it puts the spotlight on their profligate spending and lack of fiscal control. They certainly don't like doing one in an election year. God forbid they are forced to approve one in the weeks or days before an actual election--especially this election.

Well, guess what's happening? As of September 30, 2004, the US outstanding debt stood at $7,379,052,696,330.32. (See http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdpdodt.htm ). This is broken down into two components: Debt Held by the Public of $4,307,344,596,908.92, which "is all Federal debt held by individuals, corporations, state or local governments, foreign governments, and other entities outside of the United States Government less Federal Financing Bank securities." And, Intragovernmental Holdings of $ 3,071,708,099,421.40, which is "Government Account Series securities held by Government trust funds, revolving funds, and special funds; and Federal Financing Bank securities."

Washington, DC can't keep spending at the current rate and still put off raising the debt ceiling before the elections.

The second category consists primarily of the cumulative-to-date Social Security surpluses pre-paid by employers/employees that have been co-mingled with other Federal revenues to mitigate the deficits, and it's been spent on everything but Social Security and Medicare benefits. (See "Raiders of the Public Covenant")

If you do the math, you soon learn that there isn't much cushion left between applicable outstanding debt and the debt ceiling. Washington, DC can't keep spending at the current rate and still put off raising the debt ceiling before the elections; that is, unless they get creative with disbursements. You see, Uncle $ugar is effectively on a cash basis. This means they only "recognize" revenue when received, and expenditures when disbursed. There are no receivables and payables at work here. Is there enough "wiggle room" to delay raising the debt ceiling until after the elections by holding off on paying bills? Could/would they do that?

On September 22, 2004, we learned the Pentagon is drawing on a $25 billion emergency fund to cover the rising costs of US military operations in Iraq. When and where was this "departmental kitty" authorized, approved, and funded? What other agency/departments are sitting on similar emergency slush funds? Does this "emergency" drawing on funds have anything to do with our potentially reaching the debt ceiling before the elections? Just curious!

US Congressman Ron Paul, MD (R.-14th District, Texas) writes: "The term 'national debt' really is a misnomer. It's not the nation's debt, but rather the Federal Government's debt. The American people didn't spend the money, but they will have to pay it back."

Well put, Congressman.


Copyright © 2004 Fred W. Cederholm. All rights reserved. Fred Cederholm is a CPA/CFE, a forensic accountant, and writer who contributes the column "TH*NK*NG" to The Weekly Observer in Creston, (Ogle County) Illinois. He is a graduate of the University of Illinois (B.A., M.A. and M.A.S.). He can be reached at asklet@rochelle.net.



Copyright © 2004 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on October 5, 2004.
 
Bookmark and Share
Local News & Opinion

Ref.: Civic Events

Ref.: Arts & Education Events

Ref.: Public Service Notices

Travel
Books, Films, Arts & Education

02.12 FiveBooks Interviews > Lorraine Adams on The Truth Behind the Headlines

Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

02.10 LET’S REMAKE THE WAY WE MAKE THINGS

02.09 Obama shouldn’t compromise on birth control with GOP, religious leaders or an unpopular Congress - video

02.09 Cancer rates triple among New York police officers who responded to 9/11

02.08 The seed emergency: The threat to food and democracy

02.07 Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering

02.04 Your Day at the Beach Could Soon Lead to a Night at the Hospital

02.03 Obama Won't Touch Climate With a 10-Foot Pole

02.03 Komen reverses decision to cut Planned Parenthood funding

02.03 Reforming EU Deep-Sea Fisheries Management

02.02 Obama’s Support for Natural Gas Drilling "A Painful Moment" for Communities Exposed to Fracking- video

02.02 By defunding Planned Parenthood, the Susan G Komen Foundation betrays women

02.02 Ohio Tries to Escape Fate as a Dumping Ground for Fracking Fluid

Ref. Dollars for Doctors - How Industry Money Reaches Physicians

Ref. 2010 Comparative Price Report Medical and Hospital Fees by Country - Graphics

Ref. Health at a Glance 2011 - OECD Indicators

Ref. : Why is Healthcare Absurdly Expensive in USA (Part 2) [Graphics] (Part 1 is here)

Video Health Care Systems in Less Corrupt Countries

“News” Media

02.07 Did Obama make the economy worse? Not according to most statistics

02.03 Media Watch: CNN's Erin Burnett regurgitates right-wing talking points to scare retired people - video

02.02 ABC's Iran Propaganda

02.02 The Ongoing “Foxification” of the Wall Street Journal

Daily The Daily Howler

Justice Matters

02.05 Why the AGs Must Not Settle: Robo-signing Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

02.04 THE CAGING OF AMERICA

02.03 Senate Votes To Ban Its Members From Insider Trading... Kind Of

US Politics, Policy & Culture

02.12 Even Critics of Safety Net Increasingly Depend on It - Interactive Map: Where Americans Most Depend on Government Benefits

02.12 CPAC attendees more focused on the economy than their right-wing leaders - video

02.10 The Cancer in Occupy

02.10 How Opus Dei Influenced Rick Santorum

02.10 People Are Not Leaving the Labor Force

02.09 Obama, Explained

02.09 OPED: The White Underclass

02.09 EDITORIAL: A Terrible Transportation Bill

02.09 THE OBAMA MEMOS

02.06 Are Conservatives More Fearful Than Liberals?

02.04 Soaking the Poor, State by State

02.04 Reddit Co-Founder Alexis Ohanian's Rosy Outlook On The Future of Politics

02.03 SUPERBOWL XLVI: Are You Ready for Some Football???

02.03 Buffett rules: Sheldon Whitehouse introduces the Paying a Fair Share Act - video

02.02 Secrecy Shrouds ‘Super PAC’ Funds in Latest Filings

02.02 Steve Israel condemns GOP Keystone XL ‘stunt,’ cheers Democratic Drive to 25 to reclaim the House - video

02.01 Rich Patrons Are Major Source of Romney’s Cash

High Crimes?
Economics, Gov't. & Business

02.10 This is no bailout for Main Street America

02.10 Why the Foreclosure Deal May Not Be So Hot After All

02.10 Matt Taibbi assesses the $26 billion settlement designed to aid victims of foreclosure fraud - video

02.10 Foreclosure Deal to Spur U.S. Home Seizures

02.08 Banks Paying Homeowners to Avoid Foreclosures

02.07 App Stores Create 500,000 U.S. Jobs

02.07 The Payroll Tax Fight

02.07 Obama super PAC decision: President blesses fundraising for Priorities USA Action

02.06 How Privatizing Government Shovels Cash to Parasitic Corporations and Undermines Democracy

02.05 We’re More Unequal Than You ThinkGraphic: Unequal rise in income

02.03 PRIVATE INEQUITY

02.02 The New American Divide

02.02 American Airlines proposes to end all four pension plans

02.01 Economics 101

Ref. We’re More Unequal Than You ThinkGraphic: Unequal rise in income

International

02.03 What the Occupy movement must learn from Sundance

02.02 US plans to halt Afghan combat role early surprise Kabul

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web


Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland