Newspaper logo  
 
 
  Team Bush Paid Millions to Nathan Sproul--and Tried to Hide It

RNC VOTE FRAUD?

Team Bush Paid Millions to Nathan Sproul—and Tried to Hide It

by Mark Crispin Miller and Jared Irmas

All the payments by the RNC to Sproul add up to a whopping $8,359,161. Where did all that money come from? Why did the RNC suppress their real expenditures? And what exactly did Sproul do for all that pay?
In the months before the 2004 presidential election, a firm called Sproul & Associates launched voter registration drives in at least eight states, most of them swing states. The group--run by Nathan Sproul, former head of the Arizona Christian Coalition and the Arizona Republican Party--had been hired by the Republican National Committee.

Sproul got into a bit of trouble last fall when, in certain states, it came out that the firm was playing dirty tricks in order to suppress the Democratic vote: concealing their partisan agenda, tricking Democrats into registering as Republicans, surreptitiously re-registering Democrats and Independents as Republicans, and shredding Democratic registration forms.

The scandal got a moderate amount of local coverage in some states--and then the election was over. Now anyone who brought up Nathan Sproul, or any of the other massive crimes and improprieties committed on or prior to Election Day, was shrugged off as a dealer in "conspiracy theory."

It seems that Sproul did quite a lot of work for the Republicans. Exactly how much did he do? More specifically, how much did the RNC pay Sproul & Associates?

If you went online last week to look up how much money Sproul received from the Republicans in 2004, you would have found that, according to the party (whose figures had been posted by the Center for Responsive Politics), the firm was paid $488,957.

In fact, the RNC paid Sproul a great deal more than that. From an independent study of the original data filed by the Republicans with the Federal Election Commission, it is clear that Sproul was paid a staggering $8.3 million for its work against the Democrats.

How the true figures came to be revealed
On Dec. 3, 2004, the Republican National Committee filed their Post-General Report with the FEC, accounting for all expenditures between Oct. 14 and Nov. 22.

Among the Itemized Disbursements there were listed six expenditures to Sproul & Associates, amounting to a total sum of $4.5 million. Three of them were for "Political Consulting," and the other three were for "Voter Registration Costs." The RNC paid Sproul the biggest amount on the day before the election: $1,668,733.

On Jan. 7, 2005 and again on May 3, 2005, the RNC sent in revised reports. Those items were unchanged in all of them.

After they received the RNC's second revised report, the FEC expressed dissatisfaction with the vague phrase "Voter Registration Costs." In a May 18 letter to Michael Retzer, Treasurer of the RNC, the FEC requested that itemized disbursements labeled thus be further clarified.

On June 17, the RNC submitted a (third) revised report. In it, those three suspicious Sproul expenditures labeled "Voter Registration Costs" had been changed to "Political Consulting." As a "clarification," it was as vague as possible. Although it only raised more questions, there seems to be no letter in the FEC database concerning that unedifying correction.

Moreover, there are some big surprises buried in the paperwork. It turned out that the RNC paid Sproul not only for their pre-election work, but also paid them for work after the election. According to their Year-End Report, filed on Jan. 28, 2005, the RNC paid Sproul for "Political Consulting" in December--long after all the voter registration drives had ended.

And two months later, when the RNC filed their amended Year-End Report on May 3, the dates of those December expenditures mysteriously changed. A payment of $210,176, once made on Dec. 20, was changed to Dec. 22. A payment of $344,214, initially recorded on Dec. 22, was changed to Dec. 9.

As to why Sproul was being paid in December, and why the dates were changed, one can only speculate. But it may be worth noting that the Ohio recount took place from Dec. 13 through Dec. 28.

Because these amendments were made in 2005, the Center for Responsive Politics' website mistakenly allocated that money to the 2006 cycle. When we informed them of these missing numbers yesterday, CRP was quick to adjust them. They also included two more expenditures: a $323,907 payment for more "Political Consulting" (10/12/04) and $450,257 for "Mailing Costs" (10/04/04).

And there was more--much more.

Fuzzy math
The documents also suggest that the RNC may have changed the dates of nine payments to suggest expenditures in 2005, thereby shifting focus from the 2004 election.

In going through the documents, CRP located nine expenditures from the future: Sproul somehow received a total of $1,323,154 between Sept. 2 and Sept. 29, 2005. Another $472,642 is hidden in 2005. Four of those prospective items were (or will be) for "Generic Media Buys" or "Lodging, Transportation." The other four are (or will be) for "Voter Registration Efforts"--surely an expense incurred in September of last year, not this year.

Larry Noble, executive director of CRP, considers such future expenditures for, say, "Lodging, Transportation" rather odd, but he gives the RNC the benefit of the doubt. "My guess is that it's an error," he suggests. "It's possible that they're cleaning up voter registration lists in September, but it's also possible they made a mistake."

Even if that mistaken date is just a typo, it is, to say the least, not likely that they made the same mistake in nine uniquely dated items for 2004.

In any case, all the payments by the RNC to Sproul add up to a whopping $8,359,161--making it the RNC's eighth biggest expenditure of the 2004 campaign.

Sproul is currently under investigation by the Oregon Attorney General's office, for altering the voter registration forms of several thousand students in that state. Whether the new numbers are in part mistaken, they represent a huge expense for the Republicans. Given Sproul's history of serious electoral mischief, affecting countless Democratic voters in the last election, it is important that we ask some sober questions: Where did all that money come from? Why did the RNC suppress their real expenditures? And what exactly did Sproul do for all that pay? If we're going to get some reasonable answers, the FEC must undertake a very thorough audit of the books.


Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of culture and communication at New York University, is author of several books, including Boxed In: The Culture of TV, Mad Scientists: The Secret History of Modern Propaganda, The Bush Dyslexicon and Cruel and Unusual: Bush/Cheney's New World Order. Jared Irmas is a junior at New York University. Additional reporting by John Brakey.

Published by the Baltimore Chronicle with permission of the authors. Originally published on Thursday, June 30, 2005 at News From Underground



Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on July 5, 2005.

 
Local Stories, Events

Ref. : Civic Events

Ref. : Arts & Education Events

Ref. : Public Service Notices

Books, Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Health Care & Environment

10.23 We need a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty – and we need it now

10.23 Microplastics found in human stools for the first time [No surprise—we're animals too.]

10.23 Revealed: US moves to keep endangered species discussions secret

10.23 The Guardian view on recycling exports: stop the rubbish launderers

10.22 The Midterms Have the Power to Usher in an Era of Climate Action

10.22 Plastic straws and cotton buds could be banned within a year

10.22 Trump thinks scientists are split on climate change. So do most Americans

10.22 These are the shocking numbers behind America's opioid epidemic

10.21 Teen Climate Activist to Crowd of Thousands: 'We Can't Save the World by Playing by the Rules Because the Rules Have to Change'

10.20 Robotic indoor farms can grow food anywhere, anytime [we'll need this when our children and grandchildren have to live underground ...]

10.20 UK is endangering people's health by denying their right to clean air, says UN

10.20 Scottish Power to invest in solar energy for the first time

10.20 Politicians say nothing, but US farmers are increasingly terrified by it – climate change

10.20 'Making Sacrifices for All of Us,' Indigenous Water Protectors Arrested at Pipeline Company's Shareholder Meeting

10.19 EPA to unveil plans to weaken rule limiting toxic mercury pollution [Trump's rats fight back! What does the "P" in EPA stand for now?]

10.18 As the fracking protesters show, a people’s rebellion is the only way to fight climate breakdown

News Media Matters

10.23 Orwell was right: free speech is important but it is not enough

10.21 In Bolsonaro's New Brazil, Far-Right Evangelical Billionaire's Media Empire Is Being Exploited to Investigate Journalists

Daily: FAIR Blog
The Daily Howler

US Politics, Policy & 'Culture'

10.23 Authoritarians like Trump target trans people for a reason [Be kind—it's not their choice]

10.23 The steps to equality are more than Trump voters can handle

10.22 How a Gang of Hedge Funders Strip-Mined Kentucky’s Public Pensions

10.22 ‘The next Joe Arpaio’: the Maryland sheriff praised by Fox and Trump [How to profit from desperate, suffering people? Sheriff Chuck Jenkins makes the county money—and increases the national deficit and debt—by jailing more immigrants longer.]

10.22 The women’s wave is coming. Republicans should be worried

10.21 Here Are Three Easy Fixes to Social Security and Medicare that Republicans Don’t Want You to Know About

10.21 Entire broadband industry sues Vermont to stop state net neutrality law [Cool!]

10.21 Tribalism Is Not the Problem

Justice Matters

10.18 Is Fraud Part of the Trump Organization’s Business Model? [Obviously!]

High Crimes?

10.18 Nicaragua used 'weapons of war' to kill protesters, says Amnesty International [why refugee immigrants rightly see jail in the US as an improvement]

10.18 How We Can End the Saudis’ War in Yemen [THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR WAR CRIMES]

Economics, Crony Capitalism

10.17 Britain fell for a neoliberal con trick – even the IMF says so

International & Futurism

10.23 Erdogan to reveal 'naked truth' about Khashoggi's death

10.22 John Bolton starts talks with Russia over nuclear treaty

10.22 Global 'War on Drugs' Terrible at Eradicating Drugs, But Great at Upending Societies: Report

10.21 Almost 700,000 march to demand ‘people’s vote’ on Brexit deal

10.21 India: why collecting water turns millions of women into second-class citizens [And what did you do today?]

10.21 Saudi insiders would love to depose Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, whose role in the Khashoggi scandal has made him toxic, but they can't see a way to do it

10.21 “We Were Terrorizing Some of the Most Exploited People on Earth”

10.21 10 Sunday Reads

10.21 Trump says US will withdraw from nuclear arms treaty with Russia

10.20 This 3D-printed house made of earth and rice husks costs less than an iPhone [video]

10.20 Khashoggi case sends fresh chill through Saudi elite [like the disgust and fear many in America feel]

10.20 John Bolton pushing Trump to withdraw from Russian nuclear arms treaty

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.

You can also mail a check to:
Baltimore News Network, Inc.
P.O. Box 42581
Baltimore, MD 21284-2581
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads: