Newspaper logo  
 
 
  ''Indefinite Detentions'' on the Fourth

MEDIA CRITICISM:

“Indefinite Detentions” on the Fourth

by Margie Burns

Where is the Bill of Rights in the media's coverage of persons incarcerated indefinitely by the US, without charges? Wouldn't you think "journalists" like Charles Krauthammer or George F. Will would be uncomfortable with this? Their powerlessness or lack of ability or will to stand for fundamentals of American justice is being exposed daily, for the world to see.
For the fourth Fourth of July in a row, America in 2005 has persons incarcerated under the pretense of the “war on terror,” jailed without being allowed to see lawyers, without being allowed to see their own families for most of the time, and without being told the charges against them.

This is not law enforcement. This is not national security. This is not counter-terrorism. Being held for months on end without counsel, without even hearing what one is charged with, is torture.

The founders of this nation knew such dangers so clearly that the Constitutional Convention refused to pass its own constitution, prepared by some of its most esteemed members, without the additional guarantee and protection of ten key amendments, known as the Bill of Rights:

    Amendment IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Amendment V: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Amendment VI: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Arguments that the Constitution does not apply to these prisoners, held by US authorities at taxpayer expense and with the sovereignty of the American people behind them, because some of them are not citizens do not wash. In the first place, some of the individuals swept up have been US citizens. Second, citizens and non-citizens have been treated alike by this process, or treated with artificial “differences” transparently engineered to circumvent the Constitution. Third and more fundamentally, the administration is claiming or implying that the Constitution doesn’t apply because “we’re at war,” but is also not designating the prisoners as “prisoners of war”—there’s been no declaration of war, after all, and they assert or imply that unnamed prisoners (all? any?) were not wearing the uniform of a foreign power. With such ground rules, the administration bestows on itself an indeterminate power of detention, accordion pleated—expanding to include anyone not in uniform, contracting to place anyone in uniform under military justice.

Then there are the arguments that these people are not really prisoners but “detainees,” or that these are not prosecutions since (after all) the prisoners are not being charged with anything. The constitutional creators were wise to that kind of game, too:

    Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
What is being violated here, regardless of who wants to admit it, is the fundamental principle of habeas corpus—the requirement that if the state in its wisdom wants to arrest you physically, it has to have a writ. Black’s Law Dictionary says that the original English habeas corpus act, replicated in every state in the US, is “justly regarded as the great constitutional guaranty of all personal liberty.”

I am well aware of not being an attorney (in the interest of full disclosure, I have taken only one law course, in Constitutional Law, and I took it only out of interest, when I was already a faculty member at the time, from a friend of mine). I am also well aware that I am not one of the swelled heads pontificating on television, paid huge sums of money by interest groups. But it would be unwise to exaggerate the differences between an ordinary citizen, like me, and some individuals with more heavily subsidized access to major media outlets.

The policy of indefinite detention pursued by the current administration is humiliating to all Americans. It is not somehow less of a humiliation for George F. Will (formerly designated a “constitutional scholar” and a “constitutional expert”) or for Charles Krauthammer than for me, just because Will and Krauthammer go along with it and I don’t. Their powerlessness or lack of ability or will to stand for fundamentals of American justice is being exposed daily, for the world to see.

Holding prisoners without even charging them with anything is a form of humiliation extending beyond the prisoners themselves to the general public, and even to our largest media outlets. Never in the history of this country have the noses of top management at the biggest newspapers, television networks, etc., been so thoroughly rubbed in it as by a White House apparently complacent in its assurance that no media personnel dare report adequately even the grossest invasion of cherished liberties. This very week, key figures from large media outlets—from the heads of the parent companies of television networks to Warren Buffett, major investor behind the Washington Post—are to gather for an annual meeting at the Sun Valley mountain resort in Idaho. They’re being humiliated, too, for all the world to see.

Speaking of deficiencies—Perhaps it is beside the point that the violation of habeas corpus is instituted by a Vice President, Cheney, formerly CEO of the company that saw no problem in beefing up Saddam’s oil fields after not one war but two wars; a Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld, photographed in the 1980s smiling and shaking hands with Saddam Hussein as Washington’s emissary in bringing US assistance to Iraq; and a president, Bush, whose own father played a major role in the future blowback being prepared by the Reagan and senior Bush administrations.

Perhaps those large blind spots are not beside the point. Either way, either charge these individuals, or let them go.

To do neither, after all, strongly implies that there was something about the process itself that will not stand up to public scrutiny. Some of these prisoners may be genuinely bad people; in any dragnet where locals were paid a bounty for turning over other people, maybe not every call would be wrong. Wouldn’t any of us be tempted to turn in our friendly neighborhood rapist as a “terrorist,” especially if offered inducements to do so? But there is always the probability of abuse with vigilante justice, especially with paid vigilante justice. Meanwhile, that our news media aren’t getting a good handle on this kind of thing is taking its own toll. Even setting aside the effect of this odd policy on prisoners, if one could, the effect on our news media is ongoing. Media conferences or no media conferences, in general, people quit reading the newspaper (or even watching television news) when they can no longer find out what’s going on by reading the paper.


Margie Burns, a college instructor, resides near Washington, DC. She may be reached at margie.burns@verizon.net.


Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on July 5, 2005.

 
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Local Newsbriefs

Travel
Films, Arts & Education
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

06.24 Mr. Holder, You Must Hold Torturers Accountable

Health & Environment

06.29 Thinking about Climate

06.26 False Health-Scare Ad on CNN

06.25 Louella Learns the Limits of Medicare

06.23 The Simple Answer to America’s Health Care Crisis: Medicare for All

06.23 Tell ABC: Include Single-Payer in Healthcare Debate

06.23 Serving the Medical-Industrial Complex

06.22 Thinking about Recoveries

06.20 Obama's Health Care Waterloo

06.15 Obama, Like Clinton Before Him, is Blowing the Chance for Real Health Care Reform

06.11 Two Key Health-Care Numbers

06.10 Big Breakthroughs for Single Payer Health Care

06.10 Readying Americans for Dangerous, Mandatory Vaccinations

Media Watching

06.29 WP's Connolly Back, on Health Reform

06.17 Hypocrisy and Hope: Western Coverage, Iranian Courage

06.15 Excusing Outrages of the Right

06.11 Tying Obama to Bush's Budget Mess

US Politics, Policy & Culture

06.30 Obama's Torture Hypocrisy

06.30 Court Circular: Annals of Imperial Continuity

06.29 Obama, They Want You to Fail

06.26 Who to Trust on a Truth Commission?

06.26 Tarnished Shields: The Morally Bankrupt 'Family Values' Republican Leadership

06.25 America's "Bases of Empire"

06.24 Twelve Angry White People: Jury Nullification in a Pennsylvania Coal Town

06.24 Touring Empire's Ruins

06.23 Employers are Undermining the Economic Stimulus Program

06.19 Criminalizing Dissent: Obama Pot Calls Iranian Kettle Black

06.17 Afghanistan's Operation Phoenix

06.16 Are You Ready for War with a Demonized Iran?

06.13 Where's the Anger as the Wheels Come Off Obama's and the Democrats' Recovery Program?

06.10 Waiving the Rules for Old Glory

06.10 Obama's Era of Openness Is Closed

“High Crimes?”

07.03 Reviewing Marjorie Cohn and Kathleen Gilberd's "Rules of Disengagement"

07.01 Iraq: A Bitter Strategic Failure

06.25 It's All Good, Again: 'Uptick' in the American-Made Tides of Violence in Iraq

06.22 Obama Opposes Plame-gate Release

06.21 Dexter's Legions: The "Good" Killers of the "Good" War

06.18 Extending the Tradition: Proudly Taking American Torture Into the Future

06.15 New UN Report Denounces America's Human Rights Record

06.14 Fear Rules

Economics & Business Non/Mis/Malfeasance

07.01 Michael Hudson's "Super Imperialism:" The Economic Strategy of Imperial America

06.23 Obama's Financial Reform Proposal - A Stealth Scheme for Global Monetary Control

06.10 Cyberscares About Cyberwars Equal Cybermoney

International

07.01 Pirates of the Mediterranean

06.29 Color Revolutions, Old and New

06.25 Iran Divided & the 'October Suprise'

06.23 Astringent Corrective: AbuKhalil on Iran's Turmoil

06.22 Reviewing F. William Engdahl's "Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order:" Part I

06.20 Are the Iranian Protests Another US Orchestrated “Color Revolution?”

06.20 Through a Glass Darkly: Sifting Myth and Fact on Iran

06.19 Iran's Election and US - Iranian Elections

06.16 The Ir-Af-Pak War: Obama Looses the Manhunters

06.12 Israeli War Crimes Against Children During Operation Cast Lead

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland