Newspaper logo  
 
 
  Pentagon Priorities Put Troops, Security at Risk

COMMENTARY:

Pentagon Priorities Put Troops, Security at Risk

by William D. Hartung and Michelle Ciarrocca

On Monday, February 7, the Pentagon will release its new budget proposal.
For months, President Bush and his advisors pointed to January 30th as a pivotal date for the future of freedom in Iraq and security in America. There is no question that millions of Iraqis showed great courage in turning out to vote, but it will take months to tell whether last Sunday's election will contribute to a peaceful and stable Iraq.

In the mean time, another date that has great importance for the future of our security has received little notice: Monday, February 7th, when the Pentagon releases its new budget proposal. More than four years since President Bush first took office pledging to discard "Cold War relics," the Pentagon's budget is still weighted down with systems like the F-22 combat aircraft, the V-22 Osprey, and the Virginia class nuclear attack sub. None of these weapons are needed for the wars now being fought in Iraq or Afghanistan, much less for the more targeted operations required to deal with a global terrorist group like Al Qaeda. Continuing to fund these big ticket systems comes at a high price: one of the reasons the Army is still scrambling to provide adequate body armor and well-protected Humvees to our troops in Iraq is because of the money being wasted on these overpriced, ill-considered weapons projects.

The Army is still scrambling to provide adequate body armor and well-protected Humvees to our troops in Iraq is because of the money being wasted on overpriced, ill-considered weapons projects.

At the turn of the year, the Pentagon seemed to be taking one small step towards budgetary sanity when it leaked plans to cut $30 billion from over a dozen weapons programs. But the cuts amount to only a little over one percent of the $2.5 trillion planned for the Pentagon budget over the next five years. No major systems will be canceled outright, just "stretched out" over more years or trimmed back in numbers.

Other proposed cuts may be stopped in their tracks by the arms lobby, once interested members of Congress from Texas, Georgia and beyond team up with contractors like Lockheed Martin to save home-state systems like the F-22 fighter and the C-130J transport plane.

Defense funds should be increased in programs designed to dismantle nuclear weapons and secure or destroy nuclear bomb-making materials in the former Soviet Union.

Much of what is needed to protect against terrorism can be achieved with relatively small, focused investments within the Pentagon budget. Other security priorities fit outside the Pentagon budget altogether. In a report last year, a task force organized by the Institute for Policy Studies and the Security Policy Working Group advocated a shift of approximately $50 billion per year from big-ticket weapons systems like the F-22 and the V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft to programs for securing "loose" nuclear weapons around the world, for nonmilitary foreign aid and for protecting ports, industrial plants and other domestic facilities against possible terrorist attacks. The report targeted many of the same systems involved in the Pentagon's current cuts, but instead of "shaving" them suggested canceling them. One area where funds should clearly be increased is in programs designed to dismantle nuclear weapons and secure or destroy nuclear bomb-making materials in the former Soviet Union. The best way to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists is to eliminate access to the bombs and the ingredients for making them. Yet despite giving rhetorical support for these programs, last year the Bush administration requested only $919 million to carry out this work, $72 million less than the year before. By contrast, the Administration is still lavishing $10 billion per year on a missile defense program that couldn't even get an interceptor missile out of its silo in a test in early December.

If security imperatives aren't enough to force a rethinking of defense priorities, economic realities may be. With budget deficits projected at over $400 billion per year even before accounting for the costs of the President's ten year, $2 trillion plan to partially privatize Social Security, military spending increases will have to come at the expense of domestic spending cuts. Unlike during the President's first term, we won't have the option of simply throwing new spending on our great national credit card. Painful choices will have to be made. The Pentagon's post-9/11 exemption may have just run out.

Unlike during the President's first term, we won't have the option of simply throwing new spending on our great national credit card. Painful choices will have to be made in the defense budget.

Counting the proposed $80 billion supplemental spending package for Iraq and Afghanistan, Pentagon insiders expect total military spending to reach well over $500 billion for FY 2006. Even by Washington's standards, a half a trillion dollars is a lot of money. Let's at least make sure it's being spent as effectively as possible to defend our nation and the world.


William D. Hartung and Michelle Ciarrocca are a Senior Research Fellow and Senior Research Associate at the World Policy Institute. Mr. Hartung also serves as Military Affairs Analyst with Foreign Policy in Focus. This article was adapted from a piece that appeared in The Nation magazine. He may be reached at hartung@newschool.edu.


Copyright © 2005 The Baltimore Chronicle. All rights reserved.

Republication or redistribution of Baltimore Chronicle content is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.

This story was published on February 2, 2005.

 
Bookmark and Share
Local News & Opinion

Ref. : Local Newsbriefs

Travel
Letters

Ref. : Letters to the editor

Open Letters:

03.05 Open Letter to Congressman Bart Stupak

Health & Environment

Video National Health Care Systems In Other Countries

03.18 Pressure Drop: Brave Sir Dennis Ran Away

03.12 Slick Barry and the $100-Billion Medicaid/Medicare Fraud Claim

03.09 Kill Bill: Death to Obamacare!

03.09 Obama’s Rhetoric May Be “Fiery,” But His Health Care Reform Is Still Lukewarm

Media Watching

03.17 CNN Scrapes Bottom of Right-Wing Barrel With Erickson Hire

03.16 WPost Blames Obama First, on Israel

03.16 Letter to the New York Times' Editor: Stovepiping To Persia

03.12 Cud and Complicity: Burying the Alternatives to Empire's Dominion

03.11 NYT and the ACORN Hoax

03.05 Sorry, Rove, Bush Did Lie About Iraq

03.03 It's Snow News

03.03 The Woeful Washington Post

Ref. : The Daily Howler

Legal Matters

02.26 America's Supremes: Court Over Constitution

US Politics, Policy & Culture

03.11 Power Rangers: Policing the System With the "Fightin' Progressives"

03.09 Thinking About Countings

03.07 Unnatural Acts: Breaking the Fever of Militarism

02.25 Future Shock: A Better World Beyond the Imperium

“High Crimes?”

03.18 The Lawfare Project's Anti-Democratic Agenda

03.17 Expecting Gen. McChrystal to Reduce Afghan Civilian Casualties is Like Asking Ted Bundy to Cut Sex Harassment in the Workplace

03.16 America's Secret Prisons

03.13 Palestinian Dispossession in East Jerusalem

03.12 Israeli Settlement Expansions Continue

03.11 Brutalizing Palestinian Children

03.08 The Russell Tribunal on Palestine: Barcelona Session

03.05 Targeting Israeli Apartheid

03.01 America's Permanent War Agenda

02.25 Global Sweatshop Wage Slavery

Economics & Business Non/Mis/Malfeasance

03.14 The Crisis in America's Telecommunications Network

03.09 The Business of Water: Privatizing An Essential Resource

03.05 Is the Recovery Real?

03.04 IMF-Style Austerity Measures come to America: What “Fiscal Responsibility” Means To You

03.04 Barry C. Lynn's "Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and Economics of Destruction"

03.02 Obama's Budget Revealed: Money for Wars and Weapons, While More Americans Face Joblessness and Hunger

03.01 Thinking About Fees

International

03.15 Peace Process Hypocrisy: Stillborn from Inception

03.03 Muslim Disunity

03.02 Funding Israeli Militarism, Belligerence and Occupation

02.26 Iran Captures a 'Good' Terrorist

We are a non-profit Internet-only newspaper publication founded in 1973. Your donation is essential to our survival.
Google
This site Web

Public Service Ads:
Verifiable Voting in Maryland